Controlling Illegal Immigration: State and Local Governments Must Do More

In 1980, illegal immigration in the United States was far from the overwhelming challenge it is today. It was only after the 1986 immigration reform bill, which provided amnesty to more than three million illegal aliens, that an ever increasing surge of people entering the U.S. illegally began. As the federal government failed to address the growing crisis, state governments began to take action. As early as 1994, Californians tried to deal with the financial burden of illegal immigration by passing Proposition 187, which would have limited financial benefits for illegal aliens in California. Although stopped by a judge and a new governor, Gray Davis, unwilling to defend the people's vote, California's actions foreshadowed what was to occur across the United States 10 years later, when the federal government failed its people once again.

At the same time, political leaders in Washington, D.C., began to feel pressure to be more aggressive in enforcing existing laws to secure America's borders and to deport those here illegally. The budgets of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) skyrocketed. ICE moved from a policy of capturing and releasing illegal aliens to detaining and deporting them. The number of raids at work sites and of criminal aliens captured substantially increased. Unfortunately, having done so little for so long, ICE ran up against a basic mathematical problem: 12,000,000 illegal immigrants versus 6,000 ICE agents who were stretched thin with other pressing responsibilities.

To help overcome the numbers problem, ICE launched several programs to work with state and local law enforcement that would increase the penalties to illegal immigrants and those engaged in human trafficking. ICE launched the section 287(g) program in 2002, which deputized state and local law enforcement personnel to enforce federal immigration law. ICE also started the Criminal Alien Program (CAP), aimed at identifying criminals in state and local jails and prisons. Although good programs, the section 287(g) and CAP programs involved only a small number of jurisdictions, so their successes barely made a dent in the illegal alien population. The mathematical problem remained.

Starting in 2004, state legislatures began to assert themselves in the area of illegal immigration as the numbers problem equated to busted budgets and increasing societal burdens. Although the activity level in 2004 seems low today, at the time, the increase in bills passed that dealt with one of six aspects of illegal immigration caused a stir. By 2008, the increase in activity at the state level had jumped to 1,305 bills introduced and 209 bills passed. The primary areas of action were (1) driver's licenses and identification, (2) public benefits, (3) higher education benefits, (4) voting security, (5) criminal sanctions, and (6) employment. As states began to reclaim their historical roles and authorities under the Constitution, interest groups supportive of illegal immigration began their assaults in the courtrooms.

Constitutionally, other than in the areas of border security and visa policy, the Tenth Amendment ensures that states retain their traditional police powers to control their jurisdictions. Despite the enormous growth of the federal government from 1935 to today, states remain the "laboratories of democracy," exhibiting the flexibility to develop innovative solutions to America's toughest challenges. On interior illegal-immigration enforcement issues, states and localities are doing what they can to solve their problems.

With the onslaught of legal challenges from interest groups that drive the cost of reform ever higher, states have become more cautious in order to preserve what little that remains of their budgets after the economic downturn (and their years of big spending). States and localities have won all legal challenges that have reached federal appellate courts or state supreme courts. These legal victories should embolden states and localities to continue their push to curtail the migration of illegal aliens into their jurisdictions with tough laws against employing, housing, and aiding illegal aliens and even tougher laws criminalizing all aspects of human trafficking.

As this report highlights, states and localities can take more actions in more areas to control their jurisdictions. Congress should help them, not by passing an amnesty reform package, but by amending the statutory (not constitutional) provisions that limit the actions they can take and by increasing the legal means for foreigners to come to the United States to work. The only way to end or significantly slow illegal immigration in America is to create a mosaic of laws across the country that increase the cost of illegal immigration to a point that the supply dwindles to a trickle as the demand is filled by legal workers.

The fires of innovation are beginning to burn brightly in the individual states--which must be free to solve yet another of America's most complex problems. It is time for Washington, D.C., to stop watching the fire from afar and do all that it can to help the states.

The Obama Administration already is taking steps to undermine the 287(g) program. It has launched a Justice Department investigation into the Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff’s Office participation in the program, see “Sheriff Joe” and it is changing the process that state and local law enforcement agencies must follow in order to enroll in the program. The new regs, according to ICE, are meant “to address concerns that individuals may be arrested for minor offenses as a guise to initiate removal proceedings.”

“CA never appealed the Prop 187 ruling.”

Gov. Pete Wilson challenged the ruling, but corrupt judge Mariana Pfaelzer bottled up her decision on the bill for 3 years until Gray Davis took office. Democrat Davis had no intention of appealing Pfaelzer’s decision. The two of them came to an “agreement” by which they subverted the will of the voters of California.

It’s my understanding that Arnold could appeal Pfaelzer’s decision, but good RINO that he is he isn’t about to do anything about illegal immigration. It’s what we get when the GOP is led by the likes of Arnold, or Dubya for that matter.

The TERRY ANDERSON SHOW..

Terry is Articulating the Popular Rage!

Sundays - 12-1 AM EDT, 11-12 PM CDT, 10-11 PM MDT, 9-10 PM PDT

KRLA - 870 AM - Los Angeles — KDWN - 720 - Las Vegas — KFNX - 1100 - Phoenix

“Stupid People of America !!!

If You Ain’t Mad, You Ain’t Payin’ Attention!”

Call-In Number - (866) 870-5752

The Most Horriblest Clown of the Week for Terry’s August 23, 2009 Show......

San Francisco County Supervisor David Campos..He supports sanctuary for criminal invaders

Which illegal alien enabling traitor will be crowned the clown this week ???

Don’t miss Terry’s August 30th show...

Terry says that the illegal aliens should not be in the USA...

Whatcha think about that ??? Agree ??? Disagree ???

Want to take a few home to your house and feed and educate them yourself ???

Call Terry LIVE on Sunday 9-10 PM PST at (866) 870-5752

LIVE stream at http://krla870.townhall.com/

http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/index.php?cmd=listenliv

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.