Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

Has Apuzzo YET shown he has done due diligence of the British Citizenship laws as it pertains to a marriage that was Void Ab Initio???

I doubt Orly has as she can’t even seem to understand that she has to follow court rules when filing a case.

Heck, she can’t even understand she has to sign documents.


433 posted on 08/30/2009 7:09:51 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick
If the marriage was null, and BHO was born outside the US, US law makes him a US *national*, but not a citizen.

8 USC 1409 Children born out of wedlock

Notwithstanding the provision of subsection (a) of this section, a person born, after December 23, 1952, outside the United States and out of wedlock shall be held to have acquired at birth the nationality status of his mother, if the mother had the nationality of the United States at the time of such person’s birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year.

British law does not matter.

As a national, but not a citizen, he'd not be eligible to be a Senator, let alone President.

469 posted on 08/30/2009 11:49:46 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson