Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp
No. I'm not. I'm asking a very simple, very straight forward question:

Why not challenge him on publicly admitted "facts?"

Why, then, not ask a court how he could be US NBC based on public admissions of being governed by a foreign power?

On the contrary, virtually all other cases HAVE been "fishing expeditions" so far as I can tell (being a non lawyer).

What would be your recommendation as to how a case should be brought forward?

688 posted on 09/03/2009 3:35:06 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid
OK, i see. Instead of "asking" the court, "tell" the court.

Allege to the court he can't be US NBC based on public admissions of being governed by a foreign power.

Or, do you have a better idea?

689 posted on 09/03/2009 3:37:15 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

Leo Donofrio thinks only Quo Warranto action brought by the US AG or the DC Circuit Court could be successful now that Obama has been sworn in, absent impeachment. Quo Warranto, unlike a civil or criminal lawsuit, puts the burden of proof on Obama to show that he is eligible. See Leo’s site for details:
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/


690 posted on 09/03/2009 6:09:23 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson