[TomOnTheRun]

None.

Why wouldn't the neurologist that demonstrated that telepathy couldn't be happening reputable? Or the child psychologist that demonstrated that neither poltergeists nor telekinesis were present in children but rather a lot of dementia? I understand that some don't consider Carl Jung to be reputable but he reamins a lion of a figure in his field and students continue to study him. That suggests reputability. The other two continued to believe but they developed reputable testing that was verifiable and repeatable.

[Mojave]

I understand that some don't consider Carl Jung to be reputable but he reamins a lion of a figure

He was the the Ted Kennedy of pseudo-science.