Replies

Please note that people posting these notices are recent FR members. There is quite a successful attempt to distract citizens from the truth, until they get tired of the issue and give up. Obama’s eligibility problem is with his British Father. Our Consitution requires natural-born citizenship. A dozen cases have never changed the definition, which was common law to our founders, who used the definition from de Vattel - born on U.S. soil of citizen parents. Dual citizenship is not nearly sufficient. Obama’s people want you to be distracted by birth certificates. Born of a foreign father is absolutely what our founders found so great a danger to our republic that John Jay had Washington insert Article II Section 1 clause 5 into the Constitution.

I’ve been a member here for over seven years (knock on lots of wood). I’ve also posted literally thousands of entries on my main site (24ahead.com) in the same time period. And, I’ve written around 75 entries on the certificate and related issues:

http://24ahead.com/s/obama-citizenship

That wider issue is vitally important because it’s one that the MSM has lied about. Even if it were definitively proved that there’s nothing to any aspect of this issue, the fact that the MSM has lied through their teeth will not be affected.

By pointing out that the MSM has lied, that would impact all their other coverage - including of the N.B.C. issue. If I could get any help discrediting the MSM over this issue, that might force them to cover the N.B.C. issue with an open mind.

Those who keep posting that the cert issue is a red herring are hurting themselves rather than helping themselves.