[metmom]

Any group that gets fanatical can get to the stage where they do that. At least science isn't about fanaticism.

It isn't? Even when people lose their jobs because they don't toe the hardcore, atheistic ToE line?

There have been threads on that very topic, about men who've questioned that and allowed for the role of God in creation, or at least declined to answer where they stand on the God creating the universe and life, and there have been calls for their heads.

And you don't consider that fanaticism?

[CottShop]

I’d liek to also point out that the macroevolutionist- ‘long ages’ advocates are tryign to have their cake and eat it to inthat they argue that ‘the light’ in Genesis didn’t man the creation of the sun, and therefore means that Christians can’t use the sun when describing day and night as meaning 1 literal day- HOWEVER- and take note of htis VERY important fact- IF God didn’t create the sun until AFTER He created plants, animals etc- then nothign would have survived on earth for hte ‘long ages’ while everythign suppsoedly morphed into everythign we nkow today from simple chemicals. The Macroevolutionist argues that simple single celled creatures began life in the sea, using what, and surviving how again? Oh, that’s right- Photosynthesis for billions of years while they slowly worked their way up the evolutionary tree to eventually become rocket scientists- The ‘old earth’ advocates who claim to bleeive the bible attempt ot pull a fast one by tellign the YEC’er that he can’t use the creation of the sun as meaning a literal day/night cycle because the ‘sun wasn’t created until 1/2 through the creation week- then the OEC’er turns right aroudn and claims life sprang up for billions of years beginnign with simpel cells (which coincidently REQUIRE sunlight), and that God ‘used evolution’ by ‘commanding hte earth to’ (apparently) ‘Create plants and trees’ (how the earth managed to organize and construct such complex assemblies, we’ll never know I guess- We’ll just have to have tremendous faith that hte earth was somehow capable at ‘some point in the past’ I guess) withoput htere beign any source of sunlight yet?

You’d think this woukld ‘be devestating for OEC’ers claims’ but When the bible isn’t an actual source of TRUTH to them, anythign goes, and hte old ‘Well we just haven’t discovered the mechanisms yet’ answer will pop out.

The OEC’er MUST again, throw out, ignore, and rearrange to suit hteir tastes, huge chunks of God’s word (But incredibly, they turn right around and use portions of His word, and claim to beleive in God while at hte same time denying the bible IS His word) They are a woefully confussed lot it seems

[tpanther]

It isn't? Even when people lose their jobs because they don't toe the hardcore, atheistic ToE line?

There have been threads on that very topic, about men who've questioned that and allowed for the role of God in creation, or at least declined to answer where they stand on the God creating the universe and life, and there have been calls for their heads.

And you don't consider that fanaticism?

Apparently, neither is algore's hot air cult.

[tpanther]

It isn't? Even when people lose their jobs because they don't toe the hardcore, atheistic ToE line?

There have been threads on that very topic, about men who've questioned that and allowed for the role of God in creation, or at least declined to answer where they stand on the God creating the universe and life, and there have been calls for their heads.

And you don't consider that fanaticism?

Apparently, neither is algore's hot air cult.

[antiRepublicrat]

It isn't? Even when people lose their jobs because they don't toe the hardcore, atheistic ToE line?

Are you talking about the lies in Ben Stein's movie? Like the guy who didn't get tenure because his academic output dropped through the floor, but he pulled the ID card in his defense? That's the ID card, just like the race card Jackson and Sharpton like to pull.