Okay, you're not getting away with claiming you're a member of a defunct organization. Well, if you're going to nitpick over irrelevant sidelines, so can I.
Back to the point, at least you tried to show actual retaliation against Sternberg. Too bad it got shot down, and he wasn't kicked out. Got any other real evidence of actual retaliation against Sternberg? Did they give him an atomic wedgie? Did they make the poor baby cry?
Do the words, "NCSE HAS NO BUSINESS", finally mean something to you?
So you were hoping they'd railroad Sternberg.
It was peer reviewed.
And my dog peer reviewed my homework. Doesn't make it valid, even if true. The peer review should be up to the scientific standards of the publication, and obviously this was not given the post-review condemnation. Apparently Sternberg doesn't like strict review and rigorous scientific standards, so the lax ISCID was perfect for him.
Again that is your opinion. Which along with five bucks will get you a cup of coffee.
No, that would be fact, by their own admission. The Wedge Document describes a publicity campaign designed to create doubt, starting with apologetics to an audience of Christian believers. Oh wait, I thought ID wasn't about religion.
explain how papers such as the following could possibly be published in peer reviewed journals.
Actually, many ID scientists are able to compartmentalize. Even the NCSE realized this in their emails. Oh no, those horrible emails, creating such great offense by defending Sternberg. The SI had no business getting info about ID and dealing with IDers from the leading ID information source!
I didn't get away with it. I corrected myself unlike you. Who still claim it means something of a gift to Sternberg to be sponsored.
Back to the point,
That was adequately demonstrated by two investigations, despite your opinion to the contrary. Rave oon. The two investigations still remain pointing out the mistreatment of Sternberg.
So you were hoping they'd railroad Sternberg.
Are you really that dense?
Doesn't make it valid, even if true.
Okay so it is true.
No, that would be fact, by their own admission. The Wedge Document describes a publicity campaign...
No. You are not going to get away with that twisting of your statement which was ..."That would be the ongoing public fascination created by the modern ID movement guided by the Wedge Document". The public fascination was mentioned by Shapiro in his comments about general biological findings. So don't try a bald-faced lie about it just a few postings away from the quote.
Actually, many ID scientists are able to compartmentalize. Even the NCSE realized this in their emails.
B.S. are you a psychologist now? Your arguments are pitiful. Remember "NCSE HAD NO BUSINESS..." And if so, what is the complaint about Sternberg then? His science is published routinely in peer reviewed manuals. IOW, he is a "real" scientist according to your personal definition.