I disagree it weakens his detractors by allowing them to be disregarded as a fringe element aligned with fools who claim Bush took down the towers. Think about it--there is a reason Bush I and II, Rove, Cheney, Palin, Ken Lay, Kissinger and all of the right wing lawyers who argued Bush v Gore haven't joined this fight. It has no merit. Bush, a REPUBLICAN presided over the best intelligence agency on the planet prior to Obama's election and you seriously believe he wouldn't have provided proof of Obama's ineligibility prior to his election? Palin basically called the man a terrorist but she'd shy away from legitimate eligibility questions during a presidential campaign? Either she and McCain are part of the conspiracy or as I believe there is no legitimacy to the claims of the fools who also believe Bush bombed the towers. Just my 2 cents.
Obama's approval numbers plummeted back when the BC issue was dominate in the press. That was thanks to the brave major who refused to go to Afghanistan under a possibly fraudulent commander-n-chief.
The BC issue and all the other documents he and his friends are hiding show them to be untrustworthy.
"I disagree it weakens his detractors by allowing them to be disregarded as a fringe element aligned with fools who claim Bush took down the towers.
I completely agree with you on that one. Honestly, I'm pretty sure The Dear Leader was born in the US. However, if there's nothing to the stories, then why doesn't he just provide the document? Does the original say something embarrassing like "Father: Unknown?"