Lots of viking kitties keeping an eye on them!
Posted on 09/08/2009 2:15:45 PM PDT by pissant
A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.
In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.
In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent defendants Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, were restored as plaintiffs.
But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The judge is a Marine, not a libtard unless you are offering evidence that he is.
Lots of viking kitties keeping an eye on them!
Judge Carter graduated from college and enlisted in the Marines during the Vietnam War. He was an officer and received a Purple Heart and Bronze Star at Khe Sanh.
A horse head in the bed or a chicago thug threats are pretty minor compared to being a Marine at Khe Sanh.
www.khesanh.org
C-130’s had to do hot drops because the base was essentially surrounded by the NVA and Viet Cong. There were daily air strikes to keep the base from being overrun.
This thread is going into 4 digits length .... before midnight.
Geez...a lawyer with “a habit of exaggerating the significance of routine court proceedings...” get me the press room! Hold page one!
And Obamarrhoids have a way of exaggerating his birth circumstances to pretend he is an NBC.
Regarding msm press coverage: It's my understanding a researcher from FoxNews' Glenn Beck Show was present through the interviews that took place outside the courthouse after the hearing was dismissed.
...So help me out - if he was not a NBC, what kind of citizen is he, and where would the records be for his swearing in?...
If not a NBC he could be a citizen of Kenya or a Native born citizen of the US.
...Now, if he is not a citizen at all, how can he be charged with treason against a country he is not a citizen of?.....
http://law.jrank.org/pages/2195/Treason-Elements-offense.html
"....and where would the records be for his swearing in?"
No one has the slightest idea....Least of all the Supreme who swore him in.
...if he is not a citizen at all, how can he be charged with treason against a country he is not a citizen of?"
Right...you got me there. I should have used "terrorist", "saboteur", or ..........Wait a minute...
The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
Nothing about being a citizen in this! I may be saved...{:-)
On further review (of your excellent question): Leave in "treason" and additionally include "terrorist" and "saboteur".
I stand corrected. However, this judge excepted, I stand by my general premise; you have to admit it’s pretty close to the norm these days.
Funny. Glenn has been a real turd when it comes to this subject, frankly.
If the motion to dismiss is denied, there will be discovery and I don’t think this judge will tolerate any silly games by Obama’s attorneys to delay discovery.
ma refuses to leave, the U.S. Marxhalls will forcably remove him. Anyone standing in the way will be ordered arrested by the judge for obstruction of justice.
Very concise .. nicely done.
Why does that form not have perjury language included?
Lacking actual facts that state your premise, I admit nothing.
Excellent! It’s a small step, but at least it’s a step in the right direction.
Keep the heat on him. The truth will come out.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.