[Non-Sequitur]

Your the one crowing on about all the judges who’ve dismissed their cases for lack of standing, most often on the first wiff they get.

Name one case where the judge granted a motion to dismiss without the plaintiff having a chance to respond first. I certainly can't.

Carter has had two opportunities to follow that same path.

So what you're saying is that the judge could dismiss the case without giving Taitz a chance to read the motion or respond? Fortunately the judge knows the process even if you don't.

But hey, while we're at it let's take a look at how Orly did on her motions, shall we?

Motion for review of Judge Nakazato's August 6th order striking the Kenyan birth certificate from the record - denied.
Motion to recuse Judge Nakazato - denied.
Motion for a early and expedited hearing on Discovery - denied.

[pissant]

Name one case where the judge granted a motion to dismiss without the plaintiff having a chance to respond first.

**********************

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/08/15/hamblin-v-obamamccain-dismissed-with-prejudice/

http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/obama-suit-dismissed-as-moot-scotus.html

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=5936

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/01-15-2009-essek-v-obama-motion-to-dismiss-granted/

http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=896

In other words, most of the dismissals that you’ve been cheering like a chinslurp.

[SeaHawkFan]

Orly has done well to get the case this far, but I am ELATED this other attorney has been allowed to represent his clients in this case.

Orly should dismiss everyone but Obama from the case. Hillary, Biden and Michelle Obama are distractions from the real issues.

[mojitojoe]

make yourself useful for once:

https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/

[FARS]

Denied or not, are you sure Nakazako did not recuse himself? I had this reported to me from inside the courtroom as hav ing happened.

Read more details at http://antimullah.com

Your second point may well be moot since the documents have since been filed and accepted.

Early discovery “temporarily” denied! Till the MTD is accepted or denied. This has to follow a logical sequence and Judge Carter is not going to allow instrusion into evidence till it becomes a legal option or necessity. The need would disappear if he decides to dismiss the case.

Why open a can of worms like this

You are showing a strong bias against Orly, why?