[jcsjcm]

If you were to read the DoJ argument against the use of quo warranto in this instance, you would see they cited just one case that really has nothing to do with the facts of this case. All it did was cite that jurisdiction for quo warranto within the District of Columbia lies in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. In other words, the DoJ has no argument that quo warranto is not appropriate.

I've heard this comment before where the District of Columbia would be the place to bring such a case?

Have you heard the same thing and do you think that its possible that some are trying to steer us in that direction? Small clues???

Hopeful thinking???

[SeaHawkFan]

Obama’s attorney’s are just trying to pull a rabbit out of the hat. Their argument regarding quo warranto is so weak as to be laughable.