[xcamel]

So... you're a pharmaceutical chemist involved in “genetically engineered microorganisms” - this doesn't exactly square with being a creationist, because what you believe is diametrically opposed to what “you do”.

Oh, and you can thank FR's crappy spell check for the weird bona fides incident.

[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

So... you're a pharmaceutical chemist involved in “genetically engineered microorganisms” - this doesn't exactly square with being a creationist, because what you believe is diametrically opposed to what “you do”.

I have no problem reconciling them. Since, you know, creationism rejects neither microorganisms, nor their modification via genetic engineering.

Oh, and you can thank FR's crappy spell check for the weird bona fides incident.

So you originally spelled it correctly, and FR's spellchecker misspelled it for you?

(BTW, I'm just pulling your chain....)

[UCANSEE2]

Oh, and you can thank FR's crappy spell check for the weird bona fides incident.

I just tried it the way you spelled it, and the Spell Check DID UNDERLINE IT IN RED, indicating it was wrong.

Perhaps you are mistaken.

[metmom]

xcamel, you never answered the scientist’s question from post 43. You know, the one asking for your credentials after giving you his. All you did was tell him that he was not capable of doing his life’s work because you can’t reconcile the two.

Here’s the link and part of the post so you have another chance, just in case you missed it because you didn’t read that far. Please, do enlighten us. What ARE your credentials, especially the ones that you feel qualify you to critique his career field in such a way.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2336410/posts?page=43#43

And, I am able to spell the phrase “bona fides.”

So what are yours?