[allmendream]

It absolutely fits. It is a precise and exact fit.

Hurum is an idiot if quoted accurately as the closest thing we can get to a direct ancestor of all humans is an early human, then there are archaic hominids; even australopithocines are a closer direct ancestor to all humans than a transitional between a lemur and a monkey.

Either way, a transitional between a monkey and a lemur can provide NO specific evidence to support the transition from even monkey to ape, let alone ape to human (which is even further down the line).

Thus the “heralded by the (sic) scientific community as the long sought after “missing link” that supposedly proved ape-to-human evolution” is a LIE.

Some morons must like being lied to. The target audience for this piece of propaganda.

[count-your-change]

Then the statement in the article was accurate in its stating how OTHERS hailed the fossil, isn't it? After all Hurum was the spokesman/hypester for Ida idiot or not.
And he most certainly is part of the scientific community as are all the other missing link proclaimers.

Apparently you're attempting to knock down a strawman that doesn't exist, swinging wildly at your own shadow,

“Thus the “heralded by the (sic) scientific community as the long sought after “missing link” that supposedly proved ape-to-human evolution” is a LIE.”

“Some morons must like being lied to. The target audience for this piece of propaganda.”

Well, that's how it is in the Temple of Darwin.