It is a proposed transitional between lemurs and monkeys, not between anything and apes.
That came much later.
Nobody reputable said it “proved” the ape-human transition.
The scientific argument is over if it represents a lemur to monkey transition.
A lemur to monkey transition can shed no light on the ape to human transition that wouldn't take place until millions of years later.
To suggest that this was proposed as evidence of the ape-human transition is based upon IGNORANCE.
But that is all Creationists have really, the ignorant.
The more one knows, especially about science, the less likely they are to be a Creationist.
No wonder so many of your cohorts have anti science messages in their taglines and are appalled at the thought that someone might think a scientist was heroic.
Have you gone completely daffy, dreamer? The ICR News article never said that Ida represents an intermediate between the ape-human transition. The article pointed out that this bogus “find” was used to complete the primate line that supposedly connected humans to the rest of the animal kingdom. Indeed, the same author co-wrote an earlier ICR News article in which he stated that Ida is “currently being hailed as ‘our connection with the rest of all the mammals.’” Obviously, the ICR scientist is well aware that the evos were not trying to place Ida between apes and humans. Duh!