That is horse hockey. No digital image on the internet is proof of anything. No document expert would vouch for its authenticity for that simple reason—it could be a wholly digital creation and have no paper image at all to back it up.
I admire Orly’s pluck but she really needs more experienced assistance in these cases. The deck is stacked against her to begin with simply because of who her target is but she now has the additional burden of having developed the reputation of a courtroom novice who can be shoved around by plaintiffs’ attorneys and the bench.
The obamanoid kneepad judge coneviently ignores thaqt TRUTH that Obama first posted an obvious fraud ont eh Internet to prove his eligibility. That first image lacked a raised seal. So when that image exhibit was questioned, the obama goons redid it to add a raised seal, but it was added to the first exhibit as easily proven by markers which may someday come out at trial. So why would a judge accept anything the proven liar/fraud posts on the Internet?... Because as a good little commie stooge he does as he is told.