Skip to comments.
Nadler: Cutting Off Federal Funds to ACORN ‘Flatly Unconstitutional’ (HUH????????????)
pubrecord.org ^
| 9/18/2009
| Staff
Posted on 09/18/2009 7:38:50 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: Red in Blue PA
Nadler has eaten far more Constitutions than he’s read.
41
posted on
09/18/2009 7:56:39 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
To: Red in Blue PA
Porkulus ! Fat Bastard probably eats children for lunch.
42
posted on
09/18/2009 7:56:57 AM PDT
by
csvset
To: Red in Blue PA
Even Chuckie voted to defund the perps.
To: Red in Blue PA; FlingWingFlyer; altair; stephenjohnbanker; youturn; little jeremiah; ...
ACORN Ping!
FReep mail me if you want on/off the list.
44
posted on
09/18/2009 7:57:44 AM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(A mob of one.)
To: Red in Blue PA
Since when does de-funding an organization amount to a bill of attainder? Nadler has his fat head up his fat @$$....
45
posted on
09/18/2009 7:58:40 AM PDT
by
freebilly
( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
To: Red in Blue PA
How many of these lefties didnt have any constitutional qualms about cutting off funding to our troops?
46
posted on
09/18/2009 7:58:52 AM PDT
by
VanDeKoik
(Iran doesnt have a 2nd admendment. Ya see how that turned out?)
To: Red in Blue PA
Damn near everything Washington does is unconstitutional. Denying funds ranks right up there with supplying them in the first place.
To: Red in Blue PA
Non-profits like ACORN are not supposed to engage in criminal activity or encourage criminal activity which is ACRON’s stock and trade.
48
posted on
09/18/2009 8:00:20 AM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Do we want ACORN running America's healthcare?)
To: andy58-in-nh
Nadler claimed it was a Bill of Attainder.
A bill of attainder (also known as an act or writ of attainder) is an act of the legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial.
Deciding that someone you WERE giving money to is no longer going to get money is NOT declaring them guilty of a crime.
So while Nadler the Hutt DID cite a particular section of the Constitution, his opinion is worth what does come out of his ample rear.
49
posted on
09/18/2009 8:03:31 AM PDT
by
allmendream
(Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be RE-distributed?)
To: Red in Blue PA
Dear Mr. Nadler,
Why in the name of GOD do people who look like you and Henry Waxman always try to get in front of a camera? Has no one ever TOLD you?
50
posted on
09/18/2009 8:03:56 AM PDT
by
Oldpuppymax
(AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
To: Red in Blue PA
Maybe This Should Happen:
File charges on the 82 (75 in the House and 7 in the Senate) Senators and Representatives with violation of Federal Law, “Conspiracy to Fund Organized Criminal Activity”.
They should be arrested and removed from government.
51
posted on
09/18/2009 8:05:55 AM PDT
by
Chief901
(Where in the hell is the country going..and why is it in a hand-basket)
To: Pistolshot; All
"You think child sex slavery is bad? That's nothing! I eat them!"
52
posted on
09/18/2009 8:08:43 AM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
To: Red in Blue PA
Note to fat @ss Nadler... sorry your supply of underage, illegal alien, prostitutes paid for with taxpayer funds has dried up... try an excercise program instead... tub of lard...
53
posted on
09/18/2009 8:08:59 AM PDT
by
xtinct
(The will of God will never take you where the Grace of God will not protect you..Be Strong Patriots!)
To: Red in Blue PA
So their is a constitutional right to federal money? Where is mine? I am a net negative when it comes to money and the federal government.
All this time I thought our rights were free speech, free religion, right to bear arms, and freedom from unlawful search, seizure and imprisonment. Dumb ol’ me, huh?
To: Oldpuppymax
Consider what the people who keep sending these things to Congress must be like!
55
posted on
09/18/2009 8:10:47 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
To: Red in Blue PA
This man does not know what a bill of attainder is. The congress can cut off funds to any organization that it wishes. What is unconstituional is when they do things like they did with AIG bonses. I’m sure Mr. Nadler had no problem voting for that bill.
56
posted on
09/18/2009 8:14:40 AM PDT
by
Maelstorm
(Party like it's 1776!)
To: GeronL
Well in all fairness, we should not single out ACORN, so to make all things equal, THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY SPECIAL GROUPS getting our tax money!!!!
That settles that!
To: Red in Blue PA
Didn't this guy have gastric bypass surgery a couple of years ago?
What the heck happened?
58
posted on
09/18/2009 8:17:01 AM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
To: panthermom
59
posted on
09/18/2009 8:19:08 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com ............. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
To: Red in Blue PA
... so sayeth a giant fat slimy piece of glob ......
Jabba the Dim in Congress.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson