Trying to be balanced ... I think the differences between neoconservatives and paleoconservatives are as follows:
1. Paleocons believe in God; Neocons believe that belief in God is healthy for the nation
2. Paleocons believe that our rights are truly God-given; neocons believe that it is good that our rights are SAID TO BE God-given
3. Paleocons believe that the world is a difficult place so foreign policy needs to be openly cynical and self-interested; Neocons believe that the best foreign policy depends on both being cunning and tough, but in the service of openly-declared democratic ideals (i.e. cynicism is a self-fulfiulling prophecy).
4. Paleocons believe that private property rights are ends in themselves; neocons believe that property rights are important because they facilitate the functioning of a moderate democratic polity
By your definition, Thomas Jefferson would be a quintessential Paleocon! Which would be a big surprise to the Paleocons I’ve read, since they tend to denigrate the significance of Jefferson and the importance of the Declaration.
Paleocons make an ideological mantra out of “avoid foreign entanglements.” Neocons read it in context and in the context of the times in which it was said: avoid foreign entanglements that would interfere with commerce and keep our new nation from becoming prosperous.
Dino, you sound like someone who knows your Leo Strauss.