Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama 'skeptical' about more troops
Politico ^ | September 20, 2009 | Josh Gerstein

Posted on 09/20/2009 10:16:33 AM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: jazusamo

If this Kenyan SOB doesn’t have a plan that includes defeating the enemy and VICTORY, then send our men and women back home immediately!


21 posted on 09/20/2009 10:33:29 AM PDT by brushcop (SFC Sallie, CPL Long, LTHarris, SSG Brown, PVT Simmons KIA OIF lll&V, they died for you, honor them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Well that’s up to Congress, not the President. Troops come from them.


22 posted on 09/20/2009 10:35:56 AM PDT by BGHater (Insanity is voting for Republicans and expecting Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Congress provides the cash, and on occasion, a formal declaration of war. The troops answer to POTUS. That’s why he is the CinC, not Reid/Pelosi [although in this case, that’s no improvement].


23 posted on 09/20/2009 10:38:28 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: brushcop

I agree but remember this Kenyan SOB couldn’t come up with a plan if his own life depended on it and it seems he won’t listen to his commanders, he listens to leftists here at home and around the world.


24 posted on 09/20/2009 10:38:53 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
THE NEED FOR MORE FORCES, ENABLERS, AND TRAINERS

In recent months, our President and many others have highlighted the need for additional forces in Afghanistan to reverse the downward spiral in security, help Afghan forces provide security for the elections on August 20th, and enable progress in the tasks essential to achievement of our objectives. Indeed, as has been announced in recent months, more US forces are entering operations in as part of ISAF in Afghanistan now, more have been ordered to deploy, and the deployment of others is under consideration. Beyond that, the number of Afghan soldiers to be trained and equipped has been increased, and many of the other troop contributing nations will deploy additional forces, as well, with a number of commitments under discussion. And I would be remiss if I did not ask individual countries to examine what forces and other contributions they can provide as ISAF intensifies its efforts in preparation for the elections in August.

General Petraeus in Munich

25 posted on 09/20/2009 10:43:01 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Congress isn’t the CiC, they only hold the purse strings.


26 posted on 09/20/2009 10:43:31 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

BS. We have a President, not a King. The President answers to the Congress, via the formal declaration.

The President has hardly any say on the military.

Congress governs the military as a whole, and for their size during operations.


27 posted on 09/20/2009 10:44:09 AM PDT by BGHater (Insanity is voting for Republicans and expecting Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Nonsense. Congress has almost all the powers over the military, size, regulations, captures of land and sea, etc.


28 posted on 09/20/2009 10:46:46 AM PDT by BGHater (Insanity is voting for Republicans and expecting Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

Thanks, good post.


29 posted on 09/20/2009 10:47:18 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97
Skeptical about more troops? I thought that was what he wanted. Millions of 'volunteers' as numerous, as well-funded, and obedient [to him] as is the US Military.

Oh! He's questioning more US MILITARY troops...funny, that.....must be because they are beholdin' to the Constitution and aren't bound to follow orders that are inherently illegal.

30 posted on 09/20/2009 10:48:07 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Troops “skeptical” about more Obama.
31 posted on 09/20/2009 10:51:01 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Are you trying to say if Zer0 authorized 30 or 40 thousand more troops Congress would deny him? If you believe that you’re not thinking straight.


32 posted on 09/20/2009 10:51:08 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

now we see the true leftist idiot exposed.


33 posted on 09/20/2009 10:51:54 AM PDT by Williams (It's The Policies, Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

I am skeptical of his long form bc.


34 posted on 09/20/2009 10:55:19 AM PDT by omega4179 (We must be the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The President ask Congress for the authorization of troop strength. It’s up to them to release them.


35 posted on 09/20/2009 10:55:57 AM PDT by BGHater (Insanity is voting for Republicans and expecting Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

And the troops are more and more skeptical of him.


36 posted on 09/20/2009 11:00:15 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

You didn’t answer me. Zero and many Dems campaigned on the premise that Afghanistan was the real war. If Zer0 asks for 30 or 40 thousand more troops are you saying they won’t authorize them?

If they do that the Repubs will take back control in 2010 and the RATS know it.


37 posted on 09/20/2009 11:00:17 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

/


38 posted on 09/20/2009 11:02:38 AM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory
And the troops are more and more skeptical of him.

They certainly are and for very good reason.

39 posted on 09/20/2009 11:03:42 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

No big surprise. Afghanistan was a charade to make the community organizer look strong on national security (i.e. the good war). When the going gets tough though, the left run and hide. As usual.


40 posted on 09/20/2009 11:04:14 AM PDT by nhwingut (The media's love affair with Obama reminds me of a dog humping a telephone pole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson