Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barack Obama ready to slash US nuclear arsenal(Pentagon told to map out radical cuts)
UK Guardian ^ | Sep 20, 2009 | Julian Borger

Posted on 09/20/2009 2:48:19 PM PDT by VRWCTexan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-327 next last
To: VRWCTexan
GREAT MINDS IN HISTORY AT THE HEALM :


161 posted on 09/20/2009 4:43:58 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

Did anyone expect otherwise?


162 posted on 09/20/2009 4:46:29 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rangerwife
They’re the president’s weapons? He really scares me if that’s how he looks at it.

Be scared. That's really how he sees everything: A weapon for use against Right Wing Extremists in the war for worker's revolutionary anti-capitalist operations.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

163 posted on 09/20/2009 4:48:33 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Advice to the Pentagon: Slooow leak the response to Obama until 2010. The Dims are going to lose Congress big time, and he won’t be able to implement his unilateral disarmament.

I have zero, zip, nada confidence in the outcome of any election as long as there is a single "community organizing" organization in operation. While we are all staring at Acorn, the other 300 branches of "Community Organizations International" (COI) are busy putting the mechanisms in place to guarantee the desired outcome of the 2010 elections. Why else are the demonrats not concerned about the massive outpouring of dissatisfaction that has been evidently visible for the past few months.

You can say that we must get motivated and become poll watchers, but the precincts they need to maintain their majority are already in the bag, since they are controlled by the demonrats and protected by the federally recognized civilian army, The New Black Panthers, and no one who is not a Obambi kool-aid drinker will get close to the inside of one of those, even if it is only to cast a vote.

164 posted on 09/20/2009 4:54:01 PM PDT by Conservative_Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

Other than being totally reckless and dangerous, what are we going to do with all of the radioactive material? Also if we need these weapons in the future it isn’t like we can produce pounds of deuterium and plutonium in a couple of days.


165 posted on 09/20/2009 4:54:09 PM PDT by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

Most likely, a nuclear attack on America would fry more Dems than Republicans, initially. Like roaches, Democrats abound in urban areas.
But after that...
The Republicans would surrender. :(


166 posted on 09/20/2009 4:57:09 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( If you have kids, you have no right of privacy that the govt can't flick off your shoulder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

The treasonous sos needs swing on a yardarm.


167 posted on 09/20/2009 4:58:02 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (Idiotcracy has arrived 400 years early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Makes one wonder if that isn’t why he was sent back to live with his grandparents in Hawaii and be mentored by Frank Davis, the Communist.


168 posted on 09/20/2009 5:02:50 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Coburn - Senate 2010 ! Take Back the House/Senate! Stop ZERO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
This is just so we don't accidentally nuke his buddy Ahmanutjob. On the bright side...oh...never mind.
169 posted on 09/20/2009 5:14:15 PM PDT by Blackhawk (God said it, I believe it, That settles it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
his goal of eventually abolishing nuclear weapons altogether

Why the hell not, we are now nothing but a target now anyhow. I cannot envision him retaliating after a nuclear attack.

170 posted on 09/20/2009 5:15:05 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Impeach now!!


171 posted on 09/20/2009 5:18:08 PM PDT by lookout88 (.combat rescue officer's dad,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I don’t think he wants us to win.


172 posted on 09/20/2009 5:22:50 PM PDT by stillafreemind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LukeL
Also if we need these weapons in the future it isn’t like we can produce pounds of deuterium and plutonium in a couple of days.

You need tritium for nukes too.
173 posted on 09/20/2009 5:22:50 PM PDT by khnyny (Can You Hear US Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

We can’t get a hearing, The wrong people hold the switch.

All we can do is stay in the streets - contact our reps -who ignore us, hope we have a solid citizen to vote for.

or - revolt !


174 posted on 09/20/2009 5:24:41 PM PDT by reefdiver (So how's that HOPE & CHANGE working out for ya ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Can he do all that without Congress? I mean, if he agreed to be restrained by the Constitution and existing law.


175 posted on 09/20/2009 5:33:22 PM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

I think Putin has it.


176 posted on 09/20/2009 5:33:26 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

Another step in eliminating US defenses and socialization of the US economy. Just wondering which state he will sell first.


177 posted on 09/20/2009 5:37:30 PM PDT by reader25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

Another step in eliminating US defenses and socialization of the US economy. Just wondering which state he will sell first.


178 posted on 09/20/2009 5:37:30 PM PDT by reader25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...

Pray for our country.


179 posted on 09/20/2009 5:38:39 PM PDT by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #180 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-327 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson