Replies

It was an Office Max. According the audio recordings Sinclair had on his blog, they could not find any indication that there had been a fax sent at that time. They also stated they do not send out their fax summary sheets, for the rather obvious reason that they contain the "to" number for each fax sent.

However there is a little wiggle room. They didn't seem to be able to recover the summary sheet covering the time in question. Plus the notion that it was male acquittance of Captain Rhodes, rather than Rhodes herself, means that the Impress manager's statement that no female solider sent any fax that day, is made irrelevant.

However still at issue is the question of how the TV station got a copy of the fax, with the same time stamp, before it was entered into the Courts "PACER" system. That is, they did not get it from the PACER system, nor did they get their own copy, which would *probably* have had a different time stamp. They also did not get a copy of the original sent to them some other way, such as in an email attachment. The only way they could have gotten a copy was for someone at the court to rescan the document (assuming a paper printout) and resend it as an attachment (or provide a hard copy). If this turns out to be a forgery, or unauthorized, the Judge is likely to be asking them about their sources, or perhaps the federal prosecutor at the behest of the judge.