Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama and the Politics of Concession
WSJ ^ | SEPTEMBER 22, 2009, 7:08 P.M. ET | MARK HELPRIN

Posted on 09/22/2009 6:49:51 PM PDT by Pan_Yan

During last year's campaign, Sen. Joe Biden famously remarked that, if his ticket won, it wouldn't be long before "the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy" on foreign affairs. Last week, President Obama, brilliantly wielding the powers of his office, managed to fail that test not just once but twice, buckling in the face of Russian pressure and taking a giant wooden nickel from Iran.

With both a collapsing economy and natural gas reserves sufficient to produce 270 years of electricity, the surplus of which it exports, Iran does not need nuclear electrical generation at a cost many times that of its gas-fired plants. It does, however, have every reason, according to its own lights, to seek nuclear weapons—to deter American intervention; to insure against a resurgent Iraq; to provide some offset to nearby nuclear powers Pakistan, Russia and Israel; to move toward hegemony in the Persian Gulf and address the embarrassment of a more militarily capable Saudi Arabia; to rid the Islamic world of Western domination; to neutralize Israel's nuclear capacity while simultaneously creating the opportunity to destroy it with one shot; and, pertinent to last week's events, by nuclear intimidation to turn Europe entirely against American interests in the Middle East.

Some security analysts may comfort themselves with the illusion that soon-to-be nuclear Iran is a rational actor, but no country gripped so intensely by a cult of martyrdom and death that to clear minefields it marched its own children across them can be deemed rational. Even the United States, twice employing nuclear weapons in World War II, seriously contemplated doing so again in Korea and then in Vietnam.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; mhmmdnsm09222009; nukes

1 posted on 09/22/2009 6:49:51 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
The world didn't need to test Obama...he acquiesced immediately by giving succor to our enemies and poking our allies in the eye.

He isn't a coward so much as he is a traitor.

Impeach the SOB...we don't mind his ethnicity, we hate his dishonesty!

2 posted on 09/22/2009 6:54:01 PM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (For good judgment ask...What would Obama do? Then do the opposite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

I wish they’d not call it concession. Call it by its true name: appeasement.


3 posted on 09/22/2009 6:54:56 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman
But even Chamberlain was a good if misguided Brit.

Chamberlain later recanted his mistake...Obama can't hold a candle to Chamberlain.

Chamberlain erred...Obama is a traitor!

4 posted on 09/22/2009 6:58:15 PM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (For good judgment ask...What would Obama do? Then do the opposite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Let us be clear! Let’s call a spade a spade! Obama is a Liar!


5 posted on 09/22/2009 6:58:36 PM PDT by Kryn-Man (Self-righteous, gun-totin', military-lovin', redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Most excellent!

Maybe even the zombied RATS and their presstitutes will begin to awaken to this disaster that is Zer0!


6 posted on 09/22/2009 7:03:16 PM PDT by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
From the article:

When Neville Chamberlain returned from Munich at least he thought he had obtained something in return for his appeasement. The new American diplomacy is nothing more than a sentimental flood of unilateral concessions—not least, after some minor Putinesque sabre rattling, to Russia.

7 posted on 09/22/2009 7:04:19 PM PDT by Pan_Yan (All gray areas are fabrications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Amen!!!

I am not a Chamberlain defender (though he was acquitted as a good but misguided man)...yet our President is an international dyslexic.

What he should defend, he gives away. Our enemies are forgiven and our allies are forgotten.

8 posted on 09/22/2009 7:08:47 PM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (For good judgment ask...What would Obama do? Then do the opposite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Obummer is even a worse president than Carter EVER WAS and wow is he ever proving it (on a daily basis!)


9 posted on 09/22/2009 7:15:27 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Gettin’ scarier by the day.


10 posted on 09/22/2009 7:38:03 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck. (Let them eat arugula!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Appeasement weasel comes to mind.
And put sniveling in there too.


11 posted on 09/22/2009 7:54:57 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (Obama, you stop lying; we'll stop callin' you a LIAR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies; Pan_Yan

12 posted on 09/23/2009 6:09:12 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson