To what, and what amount have the alleged Subsidies been? Anyone??
The administration wants to end the current year expensing of "intangible drilling costs" and instead depreciate those costs over a number of years, which means the tax write-off occurs later and is thus less valuable to oil producers. The current year write-off of IDC's is not really a subsidy because it's always a judgment call in accounting whether an expense related to capital goods should be expensed or depreciated. You can go either way on those costs and it's incorrect to call current-year write-offs a subsidy. Drug companies get to write off all their R&D expenses in the current year, so why shouldn't oil drillers write off drilling site preparation costs (an IDC) in the current year?
sr4402 wrote;
To what, and what amount have the alleged Subsidies been? Anyone??
I am trusting that the AP story is accurate. If it is a hoax, then I have been fooled.
I have no info other than the article.
I have researched these subsidies off and on for years. The one thing I have learned is that subsidies are often well hidden and intentionally so. Your congressman does not want you to know about his giveaways to any business, industry or interest group.
this web site has a lot of specific subsidy info;
http://www.eli.org/pressdetail.cfm?ID=205
http://www.eli.org/pdf/Energy_Subsidies_Black_Not_Green.pdf
http://www.eli.org/pdf/Energy_Subsidies_Black_Not_Green.pdf
http://www.eli.org/pressdetail.cfm?ID=205