Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Sen. Lieberman, Identity Crisis Continues: Unsure what party he'll run for in 2012 (GOP?)
WVIT-TV ^ | September 22, 2009 | Joe Piraneo and Leanne Gendreau

Posted on 09/23/2009 9:25:09 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Connecticut's junior senator, Joe Lieberman, is gearing up for the 2012 reelection campaign but how the now-independent runs is anyone's guess.

The senator told Politico that he might run as a Democrat, or an independent, then again --“Or a Republican,” Lieberman added, jokingly. “I have all sorts of options.”

Lieberman's been left, right and center. When he was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1988, he was a Democrat and ascended to the party's number two slot as a vice presidential candidate in 2000.

But then, that party train derailed when Ned Lamont beat Lieberman in the 2006 Democratic primary. So, Lieberman supporters created the Connecticut for Lieberman party and he went on to win the general election.

Then, Lieberman made an uber high-profile about-face on his original party last year by becoming a major advocate for Republican Sen. John McCain's presidential bid rather than backing Democrat Barack Obama.

After Obama took over the White House, Lieberman made friends with the Democrats again. Where it goes from now, only Joe knows.

Whatever party he runs for, Lieberman has made it clear he's in it by raising cash. As of June 30, he had $1.4 million, Politico reports.

In a glimpse forward to 2012, Politico reports that Democrats are trying to get money in their fund-raising coffers early because they have more to lose. Democrats will most likely have to defend 22 seats, while only nine Republicans will be running for reelection.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; joeliberman; lamont; lieberman; senate
From one party's VP nominee to the other party in less than a decade?
1 posted on 09/23/2009 9:25:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

NO way....he might be a Democrat....he’s just not a COMMIE...like many in his so called party.


2 posted on 09/23/2009 9:26:45 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Democrat party has always been the party of slavery, sedition, subversion, socialism and surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“When he was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1988...”

24 years - I don’t suppose retirement’s an option.


3 posted on 09/23/2009 9:27:05 PM PDT by decal (The Key To Flexibility is Indecision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decal

Probably the only one in the Senate with a pair....him and Palin should get together, and they would have deuce!


4 posted on 09/23/2009 9:30:20 PM PDT by gman992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No Way GOP. He is kidding.


5 posted on 09/23/2009 9:31:46 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Lots of old glue factory political horses around.


6 posted on 09/23/2009 9:34:34 PM PDT by givemELL (Does Taiwan Meet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He should be running as an independent, but caucus with the Republicans.


7 posted on 09/23/2009 9:37:23 PM PDT by paudio (Road to hell is paved by unintended consequences of good intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

He’s a total socialist, he just supports war in the middle east. And without going too far, I don’t think it’s tough to figure out why.


8 posted on 09/23/2009 9:38:04 PM PDT by RAO1125 (Revolution's are for Marxists. We need a Constitutional Restoration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Please, no. I supported Joe mainly because of the war when the Left tried to take him out his last election but we don’t need anymore Liberal Republicans. I’m content with what he really is. A Hawkish Liberal Democrat. Run as that, or run as an Independent if the loons in your party try to bring you down again. But I don’t want you joining up with McCain as a Republican.


9 posted on 09/23/2009 9:44:36 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

it’s a puzzle to me. CT GOP insiders would love to have him, I’m sure ... but he would lose a closed primary. If that is what he wants, why has he not moderated his voting record at all?


10 posted on 09/23/2009 9:45:17 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
NO MORE RINOS!!!!

11 posted on 09/23/2009 10:12:23 PM PDT by SiVisPacemParaBellum (Peace through superior firepower!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

ditto


12 posted on 09/23/2009 10:26:13 PM PDT by celtic gal (My Mob name is" Molly Maguire" per Hannity...we all need mob names !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Joe, do us all a favor, stay away from the GOP. Its in bad enough shape without you crawling over to join.

The GOP don't need no more stinken liberals!

13 posted on 09/23/2009 10:30:05 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

RETIRE...or we’ll kick you out. That’s the message we must give these lifers...AND WE HAVE TO BE LOUD ABOUT IT.


14 posted on 09/23/2009 11:09:57 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He’s not welcome, we have far too many liberals as is.


15 posted on 09/23/2009 11:11:34 PM PDT by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

It gets more complicated especially if, as it appears, Dodd will not be re-elected next year. If Dodd runs and loses, as opposed to announcing his retirement in the face of near-certain defeat, it makes Lieberman all the more important to the national Dems.


16 posted on 09/23/2009 11:17:32 PM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
"But I don’t want you joining up with McCain as a Republican. "

NO MORE MCCAIN! EVER! See "songbird mccain".

17 posted on 09/24/2009 12:15:44 AM PDT by matthew fuller (BHO-Aks not what you can do for your country; Aks only what you can do for ME ME ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We don’t need any more socialist, pro-abortion nimrods in our party. Stay away, Joe.


18 posted on 09/24/2009 7:17:21 AM PDT by austinrepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson