Skip to comments.
What "legitimate rights of the Palestinians"?
Israpundit ^
| Sept 24/09
| Ted Belman
Posted on 09/24/2009 8:48:38 AM PDT by tedbel
Yesterday Pres Obama addressed the UNGA on the subject of the conflict between Arabs and Jews conflict and had this to say;
...I will also continue to seek a just and lasting peace between Israel, Palestine, and the Arab world.
What is noteworthy here, is that he referred to "Palestine" like it was a state already. Is that not pre-judging the outcome? He also wants there to be peace with the "Arab world" which means more pressure on Israel to cave to the demands of Syria.
Palestinians have strengthened their efforts on security. Israelis have facilitated greater freedom of movement for the Palestinians. As a result of these efforts on both sides, the economy in the West Bank has begun to grow. But more progress is needed. We continue to call on Palestinians to end incitement against Israel, and we continue to emphasize that America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.
He appears to be signing on to Netanyahu's ideas regarding building the economy as a means to peace. But to my mind by rejecting the "legitimacy of the settlements", he is declaring war on Israel. The settlements are legitimate and legal. By taking such a position on no or spurious legal reasoning he is no better than Goldstone who took the position that Israel was guilty of war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity. Nether of the positions of Obama or Goldstone have any legitimacy. They are imposing on Israel an interpretation of law which favours the outcome they desire. Once again Obama has prejudged the outcome of negotiations. If the settlements are illegal as he says, then Israel Israel must agree to withdraw from all lands east of the green line. He made no distinction with respect to Jerusalem.
(Excerpt) Read more at israpundit.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: jerusalem; obama; peaceprocess; settlements
1
posted on
09/24/2009 8:48:39 AM PDT
by
tedbel
To: tedbel
There is no "palestine", nor any palestinians but for predominantly islamist arabs
that for whatever God forsaken reson, Israel feels compelled to put up with.
2
posted on
09/24/2009 8:53:11 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: tedbel
Palestinians do not want a state. They turned that offer down. What they do want is Israel in the sea. Off the face of the earth. And America right behind it.
3
posted on
09/24/2009 9:00:59 AM PDT
by
Freddd
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
4
posted on
09/24/2009 9:46:23 AM PDT
by
SJackson
(In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
To: tedbel
” and we continue to emphasize that America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.”
Quit speaking for me Obama!
5
posted on
09/24/2009 9:46:50 AM PDT
by
Nevadan
To: tedbel
Shouldn’t the “Palestinians” in the “West Bank” be referred to as “Jordanians”?
To: UnwashedPeasant
Yes! They are Jordanians!
7
posted on
09/24/2009 3:24:58 PM PDT
by
ncfool
(Cash for Clunkers - A big failure and Obama and rats want us to trust them with our healthcare!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson