DU will be crying.
1 posted on
09/29/2009 1:24:25 PM PDT by
dangerdoc
To: dangerdoc
Better put some ice on it, Dano.
2 posted on
09/29/2009 1:25:39 PM PDT by
Redleg Duke
("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
To: dangerdoc
3 posted on
09/29/2009 1:25:52 PM PDT by
mrmeyer
("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
To: dangerdoc
He should have been arrested for treason, seeing how he tried to affect the outcome of a Presidential election by fraud, during wartime and using forgeries in an attempt to defeat the sitting President.
If that isn’t Treason, then what is?
4 posted on
09/29/2009 1:26:01 PM PDT by
Rodney Dangerfield
(Fact: When speaking, BHO refers to himself on an average of every 13 seconds.)
To: dangerdoc
To: dangerdoc
On September 8, 2004, Dan Rather cited exclusive information, including documents to justify major CBS Evening News and 60 Minutes stories alleging that George W. Bush shirked his duties when he was in the Texas Air National Guard in the 1960s and 1970s. Within a few hours of those documents being posted on CBS Newss Web site, however, typography experts voiced skepticism that the documents had actually originated with their alleged author and Bushs former commanding officer, the late Lt. Colonel Jerry Killian. As the evidence mounted, Rather stubbornly clung to the idea that his story was bulletproof, and he derided critics as partisans and Internet rumormongers. When he apologized on September 20, Rather would not concede that the documents were forgeries, only that he and CBS could no longer vouch for their authenticity.
CBS Disregarded Experts, Challenged Laura Bush: ABCs Brian Ross reported on the September 14 World News Tonight that two experts hired by CBS News say the network ignored concerns they raised prior to the broadcast about the disputed National Guard records. But over on CBS, reporter John Roberts wondered why President Bush wasnt taking those memos seriously: The President has yet to weigh in on new documents about his National Guard record made public last week by 60 Minutes. Roberts also chastised First Lady Laura Bush for doubting CBSs memos were authentic: Laura Bush offered no evidence to back up her claim, and CBS News continues to stand by its reporting.
Sticking By His Smear: On September 10, Dan Rather responded to charges the memos he cited as proving Bushs dereliction were forged, telling his CBS Evening News audience that the memos were genuine and attacking any doubters as partisan rumor-mongers. Today, on the Internet and elsewhere, some people, including many who are partisan political operatives, concentrated not on the key questions of the overall story, but on the documents that were part of the support of the story, Rather castigated. But his lame defense ignored key challenges to the documents typography and content, and the doubts voiced by the widow and son of the supposed author, the late Lt. Col. Jerry Killian. Instead, Rather chose to repeat his indictment of President Bushs National Guard service. Rather arrogantly concluded: If any definitive evidence to the contrary of our story is found, we will report it. So far there is none. (CyberAlert, September 11, 2004)
6 posted on
09/29/2009 1:29:39 PM PDT by
Rome2000
(OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
To: moder_ator
I missed the previous thread. Please pull.
7 posted on
09/29/2009 1:30:31 PM PDT by
dangerdoc
To: dangerdoc
Hotter than a Texas tick on a bull scrotum at high noon on the Fourth of July....../rather voice
8 posted on
09/29/2009 1:31:22 PM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Love my country. Hate my government./Barack Obama: An authentic "African American.")
To: dangerdoc
9 posted on
09/29/2009 1:32:35 PM PDT by
GoDuke
Courage!
10 posted on
09/29/2009 1:32:35 PM PDT by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
To: dangerdoc
What’s the frequency, Kenneth?
To: dangerdoc; PJ-Comix
DU will be crying. Hee! Hee!
To: dangerdoc
Suing a dead CBS for 70M, Dan always was a dreamer!
To: dangerdoc
This issue showed we CAN beat the MSM.
14 posted on
09/29/2009 1:42:07 PM PDT by
TwelveOfTwenty
(Hey Nancy, how many jobs have been lost since you and the Democrats took Congress?)
To: dangerdoc; Buckhead
15 posted on
09/29/2009 1:42:59 PM PDT by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: dangerdoc
Rather has so little credibility that not even See BS wants to put him on the air.
16 posted on
09/29/2009 1:44:13 PM PDT by
Scanian
To: dangerdoc
Some good news here today...
19 posted on
09/29/2009 2:09:12 PM PDT by
mowowie
To: dangerdoc
dan blather... OWNED.
Go put some Windex on it Dan (and don't go away mad).
20 posted on
09/29/2009 2:43:07 PM PDT by
Trajan88
(www.bullittclub.com)
To: dangerdoc
I'm sure Dan believes he fought the ‘good’ fight, just had bad ammo...........
21 posted on
09/29/2009 3:03:13 PM PDT by
Lockbox
To: dangerdoc
d.r.o.p. .. k.i.c.k. ... score
23 posted on
09/29/2009 4:16:16 PM PDT by
xtinct
(The will of God will never take you where the Grace of God will not protect you..Be Strong Patriots!)
To: dangerdoc
This is really sad, Dan's suit dismissed. Why, with just a few more years languishing in the legal system, attorneys sparring, conferring, writing briefs, taking depositions, racking up an embarrassing number of billable hours; CBS and ol' Dan could both be filing for bankruptcy. Well, it was amusing while it lasted.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson