[McGruff]

I'll comment later.

[silverleaf]

When did Jindal decide to become a tool?

[ClearCase_guy]

The White House is deeply dishomnest about ... well, everything. Republicans have been putting forth ideas and saying what they are in favor of since the beginning.

[McGruff]

For anyone to say that Republicans haven't offered a plan is a lie. House Republicans Offer Health Care Plan - June 17, 2009

[albie]

I can’t believe I once posted “Jindal/Palin 2012”! This little gnome is going down the “compassionate conservative” BS trail.

[comebacknewt]

Jindal = Useful Idiot

[blueyon]

Not the job of the white house to go on the attack against fellow citizens (jindal, beck, tea baggers, foxnews).
Very UN presidential

[McGruff]

"I think now is the perfect time to pivot and to say, not only here's what we're against, and not only here's how we're going to contrast ourselves, but here's what we're for."

Governor Jindal. Were you aware of this? Health Care - GOP Solutions for America - GOP.gov

• House GOP Health Care Solutions Group Plan (Unveiled June 17, 2009)
• Empowering Patients First Act (Republican Study Group Health Care Reform Bill, unveiled July 30, 2009)
• Improving Health Care for All Americans Act (Shadegg Health Care Reform Bill, introduced July 14, 2009)
• Patients’ Choice Act (Ryan-Nunes Health Care Reform Bill, introduced May 20, 2009)
• Medical Rights & Reform Act (Kirk-Dent Health Care Reform Bill, introduced June 16, 2009)
• Help Efficient, Accessible, Low-cost, Timely Healthcare (HEALTH) Act (Gingrey medical liability reform bill, introduced June 6, 2009)
• Small Business Health Fairness Act of 2009 (Johnson small business health plans bill, introduced May 21, 2009)
• 31 Common-Sense Changes Republicans Offered to Improve Democrats’ Health Care Bill (GOP Leader Alert, July 28, 2009)
• House Republican Leaders’ Letter to President Obama [PDF] Outlining Areas for Common Ground on Health Care Reform (May 13, 2009)

[goodwithagun]

Okay, maybe I’m interpreting Jindal’s comments incorrectly. I interpret it as: obama, pelosi, reed, et al. have made a stand for what they believe in. Now they are backed into a corner by us, the citizens of this great country. Since we the people don’t like what the Dems have done, it is the perfect time to pivot. It is the perfect time to stop talking and start doing. I think Jindal is saying that we not only need to oppose what is happening to our country, but to also make a stand as to what the Republican party is actually for. We know what the db’s in Congress stand for, so let’s make it very plain what the Republicans stand for. I don’t think the Republican party has made it very clear what they stand for. They (not all of them though) have only made it clear that they are against obama.

[Unam Sanctam]

Now is the time to act as a real OPPOSITION PARTY, not to engage in bipartisanship. What is wrong with Jindal?

[demsux]

Jindel is a wuss...Sarah is tougher than him

[jwparkerjr]

The sad thing is he could have just as easily cited the proposals that have been put forth by Republicans and then made some statement about working together. He needs to know how effortlessly the Left/MSM will spin anything a ‘leader’ of our party says.

It's time for someone who is media savvy to put together a primer for those who must deal with the scourge that is today's MSM. You certainly can't deal with these people as you would the journalist of yesteryear. It's like having a cute little Teacup Terrier at home and encountering someone with a pit bull and feeling you can treat the strange dog as you do your pet.

For some reason I have never been comfortable with Jidal. I have that vaguely uneasy feeling a number of politicians who are touted as possible contenders for the Republican 2012 presidential run. In fairness I must confess I've been blinded by the glow of Sarah Palin, and every other possibility pales in comparison with her.

[Antoninus]

I have no problem with what Jindal said. This is just the Obama shills’ weak attempt at word twisting.

[FroggyTheGremlim]

"it was time for Republicans to offer what they're for"

We're for change Gibbs! CHANGE!

'Cause what you're doing ain't working. Got it?

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

Paul Ryan speaks of the GOP plan on MSNBC he goes against Joe and that blonde liberal reporter witch.

Watch the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMal5JZdUIo&feature=player_embedded

The Patients’ Choice Act

http://www.house.gov/ryan/PCA/PCAsummary15p.pdf

[BornToBeAmerican]

Good grief I think a lot here need to get off their butts and study elementary English

Bobby said and I quote: "I think now is the perfect time to pivot and to say, not only here's what we're against, and not only here's how we're going to contrast ourselves, but here's what we're for."

There are 3 VERY BASIC elements in this.

1. not only here's what we're against; , which means: Yes we are totally against obama's planned health reform

2. here's how we're going to contrast ourselves; : and yes we are going to stand against it not be seen as the usual Washington crowd.

3. here's what we're for." ; And here is where the Conservatives MUST lay out a clear distinctive plan.

a) tort reform
b) allow us to buy the health insurance we need from who, where and when we want
c) remove the gooberment from our health>

Sometimes I think we are doomed because there are so many of 'us' who are so quick to shoot down their own.

Must be a lot of Pro Gibbers here. You know who you are

[RichInOC]

I think the White House would better serve itself by worrying less about who’s the face of the GOP and more about who’s the face of the White House and the Democrats. Because the current face doesn’t seem to be working.

[bmwcyle]

Jindal, you idiot!

[mad_as_he$$]

Dumba$$.

[Condor51]

"I saw one of the more popular governors, Republican governors, Bobby Jindal, say today that it was time for Republicans to offer what they're for, not just talk about what they're against," he said.

Okay Gibbs.. here's a radical idea: We're *for* following the U.S. Constitution, and *against* ignoring it, ripping it up, and installing a Totalitarian Dictator 'for life'.

"So, look, the president is happy to and will meet with Republicans."

Yeah, well you look Gibbs. 'We'll' be happy to meet with the president when he gets rid of all his Communist Czars, the Communists in his Cabinet, his Communist advisors like Valerie Jarrett, and HE starts following and adhering to the U.S. Constitution.

How's that for 'bipartisanship'?

[cranked]

Jindal is wrong on this.