There have been articles going back months about the US giving up some control of the internet to international bodies, but if this were really some ceding of free speech that subjected the US internet network to foreign control the net would be on fire about it.
I stick with my statement that few understand what this means.
****but if this were really some ceding of free speech that subjected the US internet network to foreign control the net would be on fire about it.****
This is what concerns me. If this is just not understood there would still be lots of talk about it.
Is it possibly widely understood that this is nothing more than a curtail of conservative and christian speech, therefore the liberal community is well aware of it but chooses to endorse it? As well as be silent about it?