Skip to comments.
One Scared Elderly Man is About to Make the Country Safer
David Horowitz's NewsReal Blog ^
| October 2, 2009
| Claude Cartaginese
Posted on 10/03/2009 1:25:08 PM PDT by HorowitzianConservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: HorowitzianConservative
Democracy Now.........can we say left wing marxist news program.
yecchhh
2
posted on
10/03/2009 1:27:52 PM PDT
by
diamond6
(Is SIDS preventable? www.Stopsidsnow.com)
To: HorowitzianConservative
Many of those various state and city laws banning guns were imposed in the 19th century, at the close of the Civil WarTo keep free blacks from arming themselves. Unconstitutional then, unconstitutional now.
/johnny
3
posted on
10/03/2009 1:29:16 PM PDT
by
JRandomFreeper
(God Bless us all, each, and every one.)
To: HorowitzianConservative
No problem I will dust off my Boy Mechanics Book and build a 500# Crossbow.
4
posted on
10/03/2009 1:29:51 PM PDT
by
Cheetahcat
(Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
To: HorowitzianConservative
Well since the new “just-us” Sotomayor is now firmly ensconced on the bench, after her “I’ll abide by the Constitution” statement, it will be interesting to see how she rules on the matter.
Any guesses? (rhetorical question)
5
posted on
10/03/2009 1:36:58 PM PDT
by
DaiHuy
(One Big Assed Mistake America)
To: DaiHuy
“...it will be interesting to see how she rules on the matter”
Somehow, I believe her “social justice” will be to only let the criminals have guns so that they may redistribute the wealth themselves.
6
posted on
10/03/2009 2:21:19 PM PDT
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: HorowitzianConservative
Here is a conundrum facing the anti-gun crowd, but I don't think they see it yet. If the Feds rule that the 2nd Amendment only applies to Federal property, what will the USOC rule when the BATF challenges Montana in court regarding Montana's law that firearms made and sold within the boundaries of Montana are exempt from Federal law? If the USOC ultimately rules that the 2nd Amendment only applies to the Feds, then there will be a real free for all in the states between anti-gunners and pro-gunners. There will be some states where almost anything goes, and some states where the citizens will be totally disarmed.
Surely, even stupid Sonya can see the problems it will create if the 2nd Amendment is only applied to Federal lands and not to State jurisdictions.
7
posted on
10/03/2009 2:34:16 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(When they come for your guns and ammo, give them the ammo first.)
To: Enterprise; hiredhand; NFHale; Squantos
heres my take...Hellar set the stage, now with the 10A challenges comin down the pike you simply run 2A incorporation and turn down the heat...
the precedent for 'common sense' laws at the fed level is well established already, therefore, simply declare what is 'allowed' coast to coast in a pre-emptive fed code and the word 'infringement' has been neatly redefined to cover everybody...
then its 'game on'...
8
posted on
10/03/2009 2:44:10 PM PDT
by
Gilbo_3
(Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force... Like fire, a dangerous servant & master. GW)
To: Gilbo_3
I can’t help but agree. The Supremes must be having thoughts of the 10th Amendment about now, considering the number of States which have started asserting it.
9
posted on
10/03/2009 2:51:25 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(When they come for your guns and ammo, give them the ammo first.)
To: HorowitzianConservative
Doesn’t matter what the SC says, or congress or Chucky (Seig Heil!!) Schumer. If they rule against the 2nd, let them enforce it.
10
posted on
10/03/2009 4:09:18 PM PDT
by
sergeantdave
(obuma is the anti-Lincoln, trying to re-establish slavery)
To: sergeantdave
“If they rule against the 2nd, let them enforce it.”
They (a different they from the USSC) do that now in Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, California and other places.
11
posted on
10/03/2009 4:18:13 PM PDT
by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: HorowitzianConservative
12
posted on
10/03/2009 4:29:13 PM PDT
by
teeman8r
(i liked GWB... really, i did.)
To: KrisKrinkle
“They (a different they from the USSC) do that now in Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, California and other places.”
Well, the liberals who vote for these fascists seem happy about 2nd restrictions, right? Let them enjoy their chains. The reality is different in other states.
13
posted on
10/03/2009 5:00:41 PM PDT
by
sergeantdave
(obuma is the anti-Lincoln, trying to re-establish slavery)
To: DaiHuy
I believe that the "wise latina" has stated publicly that she doesn't believe that one has a constitutional right to protect oneself, period. I seem to recall reading that she either stated or ruled that self defense is not a constitutional right.
Mark
14
posted on
10/03/2009 5:47:43 PM PDT
by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
To: MarkL
"I seem to recall reading that she either stated or ruled that self defense is not a constitutional right." Sounds good to me. If I don't have a right to play defense, then I'll go on offense.
15
posted on
10/03/2009 6:32:09 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(When they come for your guns and ammo, give them the ammo first.)
To: Enterprise; hiredhand; NFHale; Squantos
If I don't have a right to play defense, then I'll go on offense heheheh, anybody need a new tagline ???
16
posted on
10/03/2009 7:52:02 PM PDT
by
Gilbo_3
(Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force... Like fire, a dangerous servant & master. GW)
To: Gilbo_3
I’ll take it. Thanks for the nudge.
HT Enterprise. well said.
17
posted on
10/03/2009 9:02:54 PM PDT
by
the crow
(typical and bitter)
To: Gilbo_3
it appears I will need a little hint on how to change my tagline. it has been a year, and I forgot.
went to me profile page, and I could not find it.
any help?
18
posted on
10/03/2009 9:09:34 PM PDT
by
the crow
(typical and bitter)
To: the crow
when you reply, simply paste the new tag into the box below where it says ‘tagline’...8^P...
19
posted on
10/03/2009 9:14:37 PM PDT
by
Gilbo_3
(Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force... Like fire, a dangerous servant & master. GW)
To: Gilbo_3
20
posted on
10/03/2009 9:18:33 PM PDT
by
the crow
(If I don't have a right to play defense, then I'll go on offense. - Enterprise)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson