Nothing against Ms. Cheney. I just think there is something not quite right with denying a child a father.
I wonder who is the “father”? A turkey baster?
It is not their child, period. Two women can't produce a child. Words mean things, so I've heard or read or something.
The turkey baster must be very proud.
No, actually, that is impossible.
a cousin of mine is a lesbian. she adopted a 10 year old girl. she loves this child like it was her own biological child. she treats the girl like a precious treasure. she does not scar this child. the girl was badly scarred by someone else. her biological mother abused her and allowed the boyfriend to use her also. they made this innocent child a prostitute, forced her into drug use, and beat the living hell out of her on a regular basis. she was damaged mentally, physically and emotionally. she was terrified of men. NO ONE would adopt her. my lesbian cousin has done more to help heal the wounds others have inflicted on this child than anyone else was willing to do. she is not trying to corrupt the child or “turn her”, she is simply being a mother to an unwanted and damaged little girl. ms. cheney is the biological mother of her children. she is not “taking innocent children” she is being a mother and i congratulate her on her good news.
Iran has the moral high ground when it comes to the US, no doubt...
I believe this is morally wrong, and while I’m opposed to IVF, I at least think if we have it, it should be restricted to married couples. Mary Cheney and her “partner” are not expecting. Mary and a man are expecting, but she, her “partner”, and this man have decided that he not be present in this child’s life. Every child has a right to a mother and father, and while sometimes tragic events in life lead a child to lose a parent, it is wrong to deliberately deprive a child of a parent. Furthermore, this child will be raised in an immoral lifestyle, taught that a sexual relationship between two people of the same sex is morally valid as a sexual relationship is between a married man and woman. That is simply not the case.
So who is the lucky Bastard.....er Baster.....
Dick and Liz have been as welcoming to Mary’s child as they have been to the children of their other daughter. It has astounded many on the left, who continue the fiction that conservatives hate gays.
If the child is a boy shouldn’t he be named after the father, Master Baster?
Sorry, just that the family is no longer a man and wife thing. How is that changey thing goin’ for ya’?
And what about the father? After all, it was with his full consent that he was cut out of his child’s life. I don’t understand men who do that. How is it that they can know they have a child out there and not care?
Not right.