[csense]

For instance you can drive around a curve to see skid marks on the road and another car wrapped around a tree, smoke and steam coming from the engine. One can reasonably conclude from those facts that the car missed the curve and hit the tree. Of course, there are always those idiots who will say that wasn't the case at all -

Yet, you would have us believe that not only was there no driver, but that the car was actually a motorcycle, as it braked, before hitting the tree.

And you think we're idiots....

[Filo]

Yet, you would have us believe that not only was there no driver, but that the car was actually a motorcycle, as it braked, before hitting the tree.

Nope.

But nice try.

And you think we're idiots....

No, I know you're idiots. Comments like the above just cement that.

[tpanther]

Exactly....better yet...just throw a box of plastic, metal and some wiring up in the air and watch a car rain down from the sky like magic and THEN it hits a tree with no driver...

and call THAT “proof” of “science”.