Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women 'Soon' Will Serve on Submarines, Navy Secretary Says
American Forces Press Service ^ | John J. Kruzel

Posted on 10/07/2009 5:15:32 PM PDT by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Oct. 7, 2009 – Navy Secretary Ray Mabus yesterday said women soon will serve on submarines, suggesting a reversal of the long-standing ban by the Navy.

Appearing on Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart,” Mabus signaled that the Navy is moving closer to allowing coed personnel on submarines.

“It will take a little while because you’ve got to interview people and you’ve got to be nuclear trained,” he said, referring to prerequisite steps before a sailor is assigned to a submarine.

Officials previously have cited a lack of privacy and the cost of reconfiguring subs as obstacles to allowing female crewmembers to serve aboard the vessels.

But Mabus is one of several top Navy officials recently to call for an end to the policy. The Navy secretary’s comments yesterday amplify his previous endorsement of ending the ban.

“This is something the [chief of naval operations] and I have been working on since I came into office,” Mabus, who was confirmed as Navy secretary in May, said last week. “We are moving out aggressively on this.

“I believe women should have every opportunity to serve at sea, and that includes aboard submarines,” he told reporters following a tour of Northrop Grumman Corp.'s Newport News shipyard.

Navy Adm. Gary Roughead, chief of naval operations, acknowledged that special accommodations would be a factor in the decision, but one that’s not insurmountable.
“Having commanded a mixed-gender surface combatant, I am very comfortable addressing integrating women into the submarine force,” he said in a statement last month. “I am familiar with the issues as well as the value of diverse crews.”

Roughead said he has been personally engaged through the years in the Navy’s debate of the feasibility of assigning women to submarines.

“There are some particular issues with integrating women into the submarine force -- issues we must work through in order to achieve what is best for the Navy and our submarine force,” he said. “This has had and will continue to have my personal attention as we work toward increasing the diversity of our Navy afloat and ashore."

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, addressed the issue with the Senate Armed Services Committee last month.

“I believe we should continue to broaden opportunities for women,” Mullen is quoted as saying in response to written questions posed by the Senate Armed Services Committee. “One policy I would like to see changed is the one barring their service aboard submarines.”

Mullen, a champion of diversifying the services, said this month that having a military that reflects the demographics of the United States is “a strategic imperative for the security of our country.”

Biographies:
Navy Adm. Mike Mullen
Ray Mabus
Navy Adm. Gary Roughead

Related Articles:
Navy Officials Push for Allowing Women on Submarines



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: jointchiefs; militarywomen; mullen; submarines; usnavy; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-160 next last
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Now seems to me there was a Tony Curtis and Cary Grant movie along those lines. Hmmmmm...

Operaton Petticot

Operation Petticoat (1959) by universalstonecutter.

81 posted on 10/07/2009 6:45:34 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Oh yeah, I know of which you speak. I musta pissed the COB off something fierce one ‘Pac, cause he put me in Rack 21, 21-man, which is right next to the hatch for Dry Stores and my head was up against the bulkhead for the Laundry Space. Fortunately, the guy across the aisle from me was a very large M-Div’er who had no problems punching dumbass cooks in the head who couldn’t keep the noise down when retreiving a can of flour.


82 posted on 10/07/2009 6:46:50 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Even Helen Thomas???????????


83 posted on 10/07/2009 6:46:59 PM PDT by NY Attitude (Make love not war but be prepared for either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude

A SAILOR CAN f UP ANYTHING GIVEN TIME.


84 posted on 10/07/2009 6:48:07 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: mylife

I was thinking 9 months for some reason, but what do I know? ;-)


85 posted on 10/07/2009 6:48:38 PM PDT by 50cal Smokepole (Effective gun control involves effective recoil management)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
But on the flip side I was an E-4 after six months...

Does the Navy ordinarily promote that quickly...or is it just "the Silent Service"?

...and never crawled in the mud.

Apart from BCT,neither did I.One of the many advantages of being in command of a typewriter and some filing cabinets. ;-)

86 posted on 10/07/2009 6:51:36 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Christian+Veteran=Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
But on the flip side I was an E-4 after six months and never crawled in the mud.

I hear that...even making ET3 in a year was nice. I made ET1 in 6. When I got frocked, I went to the Top-4 Club at Hickham AFB one night. The positively ancient E-4 AP got right up in my face when he saw me in there, demanding my ID, who was my CSM, etc...and he was a good 10 years older than me. Imagine the look on his face when I whipped out that PO1 ID, and I wasn't even 25 years old yet. Ah, good times.
87 posted on 10/07/2009 6:51:45 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Ernest Borgnine Rules! Or was he in the TV show they made after the movie? Tim Conway, too? ;)


88 posted on 10/07/2009 6:51:47 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Bring back Submarine Races...


89 posted on 10/07/2009 6:52:19 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames
Gives Seamen a whole new meaning.

Adds a new dimension to the term "hot racking", too.

90 posted on 10/07/2009 6:52:24 PM PDT by Charles Martel (NRA Lifetime Member since 1984; TSRA rookie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

I would bet that it would be a sight to have the women that are aboard to do the dance made famous by Sub crews.


91 posted on 10/07/2009 6:52:25 PM PDT by NY Attitude (Make love not war but be prepared for either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Here we go again.

PC over practicality, discipline, efficiency, tradition, etc.

92 posted on 10/07/2009 6:53:23 PM PDT by DocH (Official Right-Wing Extremist Veteran Seal Of Approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50cal Smokepole

Believe me the crew will deteriorate long before that.

As other have noted, they will require special treatment and that means taking the rest of the crews resources.

That makes for an unhappy crew.

Yeah, the Babes get their own berthing an heads and an equal amount of guys get to sleep ontop of torpedoes and lose a shower and part the head?

Nope. I cant see it happening.


93 posted on 10/07/2009 6:55:59 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

Who would get to snake the feminine hygeine products out of San 2?


94 posted on 10/07/2009 6:57:17 PM PDT by Doohickey (I try to take my days one at a time, but occasionally several days attack me at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Does the Navy ordinarily promote that quickly...or is it just "the Silent Service"?

Not ordinarily, and not even all submarine rates. Nukes and other "Advanced Programs" typically come in as E-2's or E-3's (all nukes are E-3), and get "pushbutton" E-4 after completion of required schools. Typically, the average sailor makes E-4 in around 3 years, E-5 in about 5 years, and E-6 in 9 years.
95 posted on 10/07/2009 6:57:56 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Now my info is a few years old so the numbers might be outdated. This is how it worked when I went through in the late 80s early 90s. Everyone in the ‘nuclear pipeline’ is an E-4 before they enter Naval Nuclear Power School. Usually, the Navy gets Nucs by finding college kids that have drunk all their money away, offers them a few thousand dollars to enlist and E-4 out of A school. They sign up for six years because nuc training is almost 2 years. Then they give them another $10-15K for reenlisting at their 2 year point, when most haven’t been on deployment. Now the Navy owns you for eight years. After eight years most are disgruntled and turn down the next reenlistment bonus even though when I got out it was between $30 - 45K for an additional two years.


96 posted on 10/07/2009 6:59:23 PM PDT by Pan_Yan (All gray areas are fabrications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude
I would bet that it would be a sight to have the women that are aboard to do the dance made famous by Sub crews.

Oh, I'd pay good money to see one of them run around the Horse and Cow doing the, "Dance of the Flaming A***oles."
97 posted on 10/07/2009 6:59:52 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

I have a suggestion. and the gals aint gonna like it.


98 posted on 10/07/2009 7:00:24 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

You got that right! LOL.


99 posted on 10/07/2009 7:01:09 PM PDT by NY Attitude (Make love not war but be prepared for either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
Not ordinarily, and not even all submarine rates. Nukes and other "Advanced Programs" typically come in as E-2's or E-3's (all nukes are E-3), and get "pushbutton" E-4 after completion of required schools. Typically, the average sailor makes E-4 in around 3 years, E-5 in about 5 years, and E-6 in 9 years.

Back in the old days ..... I entered E3, E4 after A school, E5 after Nuke school and E6 in 4 1/2.

100 posted on 10/07/2009 7:01:13 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson