Notice bldg 5 and 6 were closer to towers and actually did have the towers fall on them, a direct hit, and were on fire....they did not collapse...their steel framing withstood the direct hit..there’s even an aerial photo in the Fema report on bldg 7 that shows this...It can’t be true, what the conspiracy people say...if it were, that would mean that we were the aggressors and were killing masses of people just for empire.
Yeah, actually, they did collapse.
And it is not relevant anyway. In a severe earthquake, in some buildings collapse, some don’t.
The fact that not every building collapses does not invalidate the fact that some did. If some buildigns did not collapse, does that mean that the buildings that did collapse could not have collapsed from the earthquake?
Furthermore, high rise buildings WEIGH MORE. THere is more weight much higher in the air. To reach great heights, high-rise buildings require very LIGHT weight construction, to reduce the height piled up at great heights.
So the total weight of all the many floors is greater, while the building is actually WEAKER.
So a high-rise building is far more likely to collapse when damaged than a low-rise building.