Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Admits Campaign Tensions Between Palin, Aides
Washington Post ^ | 10/11/2009 | Garance Franke-Ruta

Posted on 10/11/2009 8:23:33 AM PDT by Saije

Former presidential candidate John McCain (R-Ariz.) acknowledged on CNN's State of the Union Sunday that tensions flared during his campaign between senior strategist Steve Schmidt and those allied with his running mate, then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

"With a high-pressure situation, there's always tensions that develop within campaigns," McCain said in a video excerpt posted online. "And there were clearly tensions between Steve Schmidt and people in the Palin camp."

Schmidt has recently become a vocal public critic of Palin, predicting that a presidential run by her in 2012 would prove "catastrophic" for the Republican Party. McCain did not criticize Palin and called her an overall asset to his campaign for whom he still has affection.

"There are fundamental facts ... that cannot be denied," McCain said. "When we selected or asked Sarah Palin to be my running mate, it energized our party. We were ahead in the polls, until the stock market crashed. And she still is a formidable force in the Republican Party."

"And I have great affection for her," he continued. "Did we always agree on everything in the past? Will we in the future? No."

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; election; mccain; palin; tension
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last
To: Will88

I think the economic crisis of last October was completely manufactured. It scared the American people. Up until it became news McCain-Palin were ahead 8 points after the Republican Convention. Day by day I saw that lead shrink on the map as the media began to scream crisis on the economy.

When the American people are afraid they vote for Democrats. Which is why FDR got 4 terms. When Americans are fearless and strong and secure they vote for Republicans. Which is why Reagan got two terms.


61 posted on 10/11/2009 8:55:00 AM PDT by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

So why did this great rino leader permit schmit to stay on his team if he knew schmit was undermining his own ticket?

McCain totally amazes me for his stupidity. Or he may be stupid like a fox and have been working to get a Marxist in power by undermining his own campaign? Stupid is the only other explaination.


62 posted on 10/11/2009 8:55:28 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Saije

Amazing. I never heard of this simple pantload Steve Schmidt until he started to smear Palin. The Democrat “mainstream” newsrooms now love the guy, of course, so they’ve made him a “celebrity”... Which, of course, Schmidt the media whore enjoys and so off he goes on a Palin-bashing tour. “Look at me! Look at me!”


63 posted on 10/11/2009 8:55:57 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deannadurbin
You have to go back even further. If the Republican Party had not nominated fake conservative Bush, but a REAL CONSERVATIVE, there is NO WAY that ALL THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT would have fallen to socialists.

I believe Reagan's worst mistake was his VP selection. That elevated this family of phony Texans to political success they could never have achieved on their own, and it planted the seeds for the weakening of the conservative movement. W's second term was a disaster, and it is still hard to believe how far Republicans fell from 2004 until 2008.

64 posted on 10/11/2009 8:57:17 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I agree.

But your comment was, Bush threw them in jail.

Big difference.


65 posted on 10/11/2009 8:57:48 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: classified; bray
Remember the name Steve Schmidt. He is a negative for the conservatives....He will be floating around attached to someone in the upcoming elections and should be shunned and tossed aside when considering anyone he is attached too. I will send this article to Rush. It is important that these people are flushed out and to the serface of all Conservative’s awareness. Steve is a piece of the corruptive force that is trying to destroy the conservative movement and drive it to RINO thinking!

I completely agree! He is one of the reasons that we are where we are today. Evil has insinuated itself in both parties. I have yet to find exactly why Schmidt dislikes Palin so much. Can it be that he is totally anti-conservative?

He has referred to himself as a "raging moderate." WaPo: The Silver Bullet

66 posted on 10/11/2009 8:58:07 AM PDT by PuzzledInTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: greedo

There’s no way that’s Laura Bush’s twitter account. Just like hte 16 Ruch Limbaughs are all fakes......


67 posted on 10/11/2009 8:58:18 AM PDT by mockingbyrd (Sarah speaks for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Will88

I agree.


68 posted on 10/11/2009 8:58:52 AM PDT by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc

Oh really?

What PROMISE was that?


69 posted on 10/11/2009 8:58:59 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: digital-olive
I wasn’t happy about the last election until Palin jumped into the ring. I voted for her and no one else.

Right on! Something many of us experienced.
70 posted on 10/11/2009 9:00:07 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
If you’d like to know much more...

That would be impossible. I already know everything.

71 posted on 10/11/2009 9:03:51 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Will88
Clueless Obama looked better saying nothing for several days and just standing to the side.

I don't believe Barack Ugabe was "clueless". I think his campaign was given a heads-up, and Barack Ugabe was told to keep his head down. It is my opinion that the entire "economic meltdown crisis, oh my!", which occurred just 6 weeks before the general election (by sheer coincidence, LMAO!), was timed and orchestrated by somebody who had a big stake in seeing Barack Ugabe get elected. Now, who in the world of big finance and money dealing would have the kind of wealth and influence to pull off something like this?

72 posted on 10/11/2009 9:05:14 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol; Victoria Delsoul; cripplecreek; PennsylvaniaMom; KansasGirl; Perdogg; jla; ...

Ping!


73 posted on 10/11/2009 9:06:33 AM PDT by SolidWood (Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saije

Somewhat revisionist.

"We were ahead in the polls, until the stock market crashed ... " McCain rushed to Washington to resurrect the bailout bill that had gotten trounced. Not only did he help resurrect it, but he assisted in getting about $184 Billion pork added to it. After JohnnyMc voted for it, his numbers declined significantly, and they did not improve.

JohnnyMc shot himself in the foot and blamed the Stock Market crash.

Facts sort of get in the way, JohnnyMc:

July 15 DOW 10,962  
Sept 23 10,854  
Sept 24 10,825 McCain Suspends
Oct 01 10,831  
Oct 10 8,451 Market Drops

74 posted on 10/11/2009 9:06:51 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

:)


75 posted on 10/11/2009 9:07:47 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Richard Mellon Scaithe!


76 posted on 10/11/2009 9:08:13 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: deannadurbin
I think the economic crisis of last October was completely manufactured. It scared the American people.

I don't think the full story on that is known yet, and it'll probably be a few more years before it can be really understood. I think there was some degree of crisis, but also that it might have been greatly overblown, maybe because some panicked, or maybe because some used it for their benefit. Don't really know for now.

77 posted on 10/11/2009 9:08:17 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Saije

Go away john. Please, just go away.


78 posted on 10/11/2009 9:11:23 AM PDT by noname07718 (Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction-Ronald Reagan 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

Who? Is that guy an Ugabe supporter?


79 posted on 10/11/2009 9:11:42 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Will88

“or maybe because some used it for their benefit.”

Geez, you think? Only Paulsen knows for sure? It was all about paying off Wall St., not saving it.


80 posted on 10/11/2009 9:12:29 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson