Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan nukes safe despite militant threat: Clinton
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 10/11/09 | Lachlan Carmichael

Posted on 10/11/2009 5:48:45 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

LONDON (AFP) – US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Sunday the latest militant attack in Pakistan shows an "increasing" threat to the state, but voiced confidence Islamabad was in control of its nuclear arsenal.

Clinton told reporters in London that the militants' brazen bid to storm the Pakistani military headquarters in Rawalpindi on Saturday highlighted the scale of the threat.

The attack brought renewed US focus on Pakistan, which has won praise from Washington for its new crackdown on militants, just as the Obama administration tries to revise its strategy in neighboring Afghanistan.

"Yesterday was another reminder that extremists ... are increasingly threatening the authority of the state," Clinton said at a press conference with British Foreign Secretary David Miliband.

"But we see no evidence that they (the militants) are going to take over the state," the chief US diplomat said following around 90 minutes of talks that dealt extensively with Afghanistan and Pakistan.

"We have confidence in the Pakistani government and the military's control over nuclear weapons," Clinton added.

Miliband recalled that the United States and Britain had long agreed that militants including the Taliban, which mount attacks into Afghanistan from Pakistan's border areas, represent a "mortal threat" to Islamabad.

But "it is a mortal threat that can and will be defeated by united action by the civilian and military leadership in Pakistan with the support of their people and the support of the international community."

The US Congress has just approved 7.5 billion dollars in economic and military aid for Pakistan, which earned US plaudits in recent months for their military offensive against the Taliban in the Swat valley.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: hillaryclinton; militants; nukes; pakistan; safe; threat; wot
WTC 1993 .. The first attack .. hmmmm. Who was in charge then?
1 posted on 10/11/2009 5:48:45 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“7.5 billion dollars”

You could rebuild most of Detroit for that.


2 posted on 10/11/2009 5:52:50 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Like I would believe that witch.


3 posted on 10/11/2009 5:53:39 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"WTC 1993 .. The first attack .. hmmmm. Who was in charge then? "
hmmmmmm. No one. Billy was to busy ruining the young women's blue dress. Cigar anyone... Sandy the burglar must have been so jealous.
4 posted on 10/11/2009 5:57:56 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (I'll go back to when I joined this great site back in 2005....Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

And she knows how?

Half a rope-a-dope by Pakistan,
and half an utter groveling to terrorists by the State Dept.


5 posted on 10/11/2009 6:00:05 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The only way the Hillabeast would recognize a nuclear weapon would be for her to see “NUKE” pasted all over the darned thing.

And if we past the word “SAFE” alongside, she’ll properly conclude that it’s safe.


6 posted on 10/11/2009 6:02:24 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

She too has become subject to the “you lie” syndrome as well as being victimized by Pakistani sleepers.

The threat that made itself very apparent demonstrates (one of the wests worst fears) only a initial taste of whats to come.

IMO


7 posted on 10/11/2009 6:08:30 PM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

India should have nuked Pakistan by now.


8 posted on 10/11/2009 6:28:26 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It might be safe now, but as Iran works to destabalize Pakistan, how long will those nukes be safe?

Once again, Hillary uses deceptive language to throw attention away from the truth. Isn’t that just like the typical boiler plate politician?


9 posted on 10/11/2009 6:33:28 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Obama Administration is a blueprint for Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

They will once it gets to the point they have no choice.


10 posted on 10/11/2009 7:00:37 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I suppose if we see the elitists, esp. the political class start heading in ONE direction, like to another country....we know there’s a nuke headed our way! That’ll be the only way we know.


11 posted on 10/11/2009 7:10:17 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Democrat party has always been the party of slavery, sedition, subversion, socialism and surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

“Iran works to destabalize Pakistan”

Iran is not destabilizing Pakistan.


12 posted on 10/12/2009 1:35:32 PM PDT by Rookie Cookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rookie Cookie
The Al Qaeda is working to destabilize Pakistan. It is becoming more apparent that Iran has direct links to the Al Qaeda, and have been working with them for a long time.
13 posted on 10/12/2009 9:13:18 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Obama Administration is a blueprint for Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
Wrong. Pakistan has links with Al Qaeda and is destabilizing the whole region. The Al Qaeda and Taliban are armed by the ISI not Iran.
14 posted on 10/12/2009 10:03:29 PM PDT by Rookie Cookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rookie Cookie
We know that Saif al-Adel flew from Kandahar to Iran, with 13 members of his brother-in-law Abu al-Walid’s family, along with Saad Bin Laden (Osama's brother) and a number of other fighters. Asharq Al Awsat, a newspaper that is controlled by the Saudi royal family, published a report claiming that al Qaeda is using Iran as a "base of operations."
15 posted on 10/13/2009 9:09:43 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Obama Administration is a blueprint for Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson