Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Buckhead
"The Court found that Plaintiff had failed to satisfy any of the elements necessary for a federal court to interfere with a deployment order issued by the U.S. Army. The Court further found the action to be legally frivolous, meaning that no reasonable attorney could have expected that her legal claim would prevail under existing law or under a reasonable extension or modification of existing law. The claims were based solely on conjecture and speculation that the President may not have been born in the United States."

Just what all us supposed "trolls" have been saying all along. You don't go to court with speculation.

103 posted on 10/13/2009 8:49:49 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: mlo
"The Court makes no apology for the tone of its previous orders. They were direct and strong but apparently not strong enough. They certainly do not demonstrate personal bias. They do demonstrate a lack of tolerance for frivolous legal claims asserted by lawyers who should know better. A Court’s insistence that lawyers comply with their duty to follow the rules and their obligations as officers of the Court is not a legitimate basis for recusal."
116 posted on 10/13/2009 9:00:37 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: mlo
You don't go to court with speculation.

Federal agents do it all the time. Ever seen the Waco Warrant application?

627 posted on 10/13/2009 2:38:46 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson