LorenC,
Seriously. I don’t believe in name calling. But who and what are you?
Did you not see my post? The COLB posted by obama, has the words:
“TERRIK has determined this COLB HAS NO LEGAL VERACITY because it was stamped with “DATE FILED BY REGISTRAR” instead of “DATE ACCEPTED BY STATE REGISTRAR”.
DO you understand? The COLB that so many senators, congressmen, judges, people have - the one and only piece of evidence - to hang their hat on has NO LEGAL VERACITY.
This is sarcasm right?
I'm a libertarian lawyer from Georgia. And you are?
Did you not see my post? The COLB posted by obama, has the words:
“TERRIK has determined this COLB HAS NO LEGAL VERACITY because it was stamped with “DATE FILED BY REGISTRAR” instead of “DATE ACCEPTED BY STATE REGISTRAR”.
TerriK is wrong. A COLB requested from the state of Hawaii now says "Date Filed by Registrar." The new language does not make the document legally invalid.
That's her theory, but she may be wrong. it may be that Hawaii changed the terminology on the COLB's issued after some date, sometime between 2003 and 2007. Or maybe not, but it'll only take a few examples, or just one, with a long form saying "accepted by" and the COLB saying "filed by" for the same person, to prove her wrong. At least one such set has already been posted here on FR. The "accepted by" language is clearly part of the '61 and '63 BC forms, it's not something stamped or typed on the printed form.
I'm more concerned by the date shown, the Tueday after the Friday evening birth, and the file sequence number. In comparison, the Nordyke twins', born 19 hours after BHO's COLB image says he was born, in the same hospital (Maybe?? since he won't say which hospital he was born in) which show file numbers *lower* than his, and an "accepted by" date 3 days after his. Now that is something to make you go "Hmmm?"