Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Orly Taitz Sanctioned for $20,000
The Washington Independent ^ | 10/13/09 | David Weigel

Posted on 10/13/2009 10:27:03 AM PDT by jaxon72

The “Birther queen” has been slapped with a five-figure fine for “wasting the judicial resources” of the Middle District of Georgia, where she’d filed one of her numerous lawsuits demanding that President Obama prove his citizenship before deploying soldiers to Iraq and Afghanistan. The judgment, which calls Taitz’s case and tactics “delusional”:

"Counsel Orly Taitz is hereby ordered to pay $20,000.00 to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerk’s Office, within thirty days of the date of this Order as a sanction for her misconduct in violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure."

The entire document, and some key excerpts, after the jump.

Judge Clay Land makes the toughest statement about Taitz’s antics here:

"The Court finds that counsel’s conduct was willful and not merely negligent. It demonstrates bad faith on her part. As an attorney, she is deemed to have known better. She owed a duty to follow the rules and to respect the Court. Counsel’s pattern of conduct conclusively establishes that she did not mistakenly violate a provision of law. She knowingly violated Rule 11. Her response to the Court’s show cause order is breathtaking in its arrogance and borders on delusional. She expresses no contrition or regret regarding her misconduct. To the contrary, she continues her baseless attacks on the Court."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonindependent.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; birthers; certifigate; fruitcake; orlytaitz; romney; romney4obama; romneyantigop; romneybotsantigop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 10/13/2009 10:27:04 AM PDT by jaxon72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jaxon72
Good. She deserves it.
2 posted on 10/13/2009 10:27:57 AM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaxon72

3 posted on 10/13/2009 10:29:27 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

For what? Asking for proof that someone is eligble? She is a citizen and is entitled to know.


4 posted on 10/13/2009 10:31:13 AM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jaxon72

Ouch. 20K is a lot of root canals.


5 posted on 10/13/2009 10:31:27 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Ram "Health Care Reform" down our throats in '09, and we'll ram it up your @ss in '10.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

Now ... why would you say THAT ?


6 posted on 10/13/2009 10:32:29 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jaxon72

Orly responded by telling the judge to “shove it”

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/birther_orly_taitz_responds_to_judges_20k_fine_sho.php?ref=mp

I wonder how many judges will be willing to take any future cases from her based on this reaction?


7 posted on 10/13/2009 10:33:22 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

She’s been hollering for months now that she has Obama’s birth certificate, yet never manages to turn it over to a judge.


8 posted on 10/13/2009 10:33:26 AM PDT by jaxon72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
He/she teaches corporate market finances in a business school in the state of Washington.

I can connect the dots.

9 posted on 10/13/2009 10:34:53 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

“For what? Asking for proof that someone is eligble? She is a citizen and is entitled to know.”

I’m with you. We’re all entitled to know, yet insults abound and no proof offered. Land’s decision is no surprise. I’m going to wait and see regarding the case pending in Carters court.


10 posted on 10/13/2009 10:35:46 AM PDT by milford421 (U.N. OUT OF U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jaxon72

And who is surprised? None of this will be allowed to go forward.


11 posted on 10/13/2009 10:36:43 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaxon72
Yeah. This is like Fitzmas isn't it.
12 posted on 10/13/2009 10:39:19 AM PDT by McGruff (Go rogue baby, go rogue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

What about her hooters?


13 posted on 10/13/2009 10:39:25 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jaxon72

I think what will be more interesting of a result is what comes of the complaint by Capt. Connie Rhodes against Orly. A fine is just money, I’m sure someone will donate that to her, but the client’s complaint could have legal consequences.


14 posted on 10/13/2009 10:41:51 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milford421

The citizens are peons and The Constitution is a memory. These judges are scum.


15 posted on 10/13/2009 10:44:35 AM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's health care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
For what? Asking for proof that someone is eligble?

No, for bad faith, deliberate violations of the law, breathtaking arrogance, delusions, willful misconduct, and baseless attacks on the court. Did't you read the article?

16 posted on 10/13/2009 10:46:15 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Pretty frustrating.


17 posted on 10/13/2009 10:47:16 AM PDT by milford421 (U.N. OUT OF U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
For what? Asking for proof that someone is eligble?

No, for "asserting claims and legal positions that are not well-founded under existing law or through the modification , extension, or expansion of existing law." Also for "using the courts for a purpose unrelated to the resolution of a legitimate legal cause of action."

Of course, accusing the judge of all sorts of things, including a secret meeting with the Attorney General Holder, didn't help. I mean, she said that because he owns some Microsoft stock, and they're "aligned both politically and economically" with Obama, that he was biased and should recuse himself.

18 posted on 10/13/2009 10:51:06 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

And you sure deserve an illegal alien and usurper that in a short future will force you to raise your right hand in admiration like another foreign tyrant was able to force his will on 62 million cool aid drinkers in Europe. Enjoy your choosing of your fuhrer!!!


19 posted on 10/13/2009 11:43:50 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

I hope a tree falls on you.


20 posted on 10/13/2009 11:46:15 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We need more Joe Wilson's. OBAMA is ACORN ACORN is OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson