So sad.
1 posted on
10/14/2009 7:50:51 PM PDT by
james500
To: james500
2 posted on
10/14/2009 7:51:07 PM PDT by
james500
To: james500
I guess they could not get any real buyers for the Globe so they have decided to just keep it.
To: james500
Good. Keep that open artery flowing...
4 posted on
10/14/2009 7:53:44 PM PDT by
Interesting Times
(For the truth about "swift boating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
To: james500
Throwing good money after bad 101.
Either that, or they know the fix is in. Bailout coming in second stimulus package. You help me out, I’ll help you out.
I wonder where Mr. Skinny is in all this?
5 posted on
10/14/2009 7:57:05 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Without the second, the rest are just politicians BS.)
To: james500
They will just implement the Newsweek model of liberal economics: Raise the price, reduce the page count and increase ad rates. If that doesn't work, do it all again until it does.
6 posted on
10/14/2009 7:58:02 PM PDT by
LostInBayport
(When the riders in the cart outnumber those pulling the cart, the cart stops moving. My back hurts.)
To: james500; abb
Soviet style news writing
After months of hunting for a buyer, The New York Times Company said on Wednesday that it had decided not to sell The Boston Globe
No serious bids were made, thats my interpretation. Gotta read the Soviet papers between the lines.
7 posted on
10/14/2009 8:08:01 PM PDT by
GeronL
To: james500
12 posted on
10/14/2009 8:35:55 PM PDT by
VOA
To: james500
Both ‘liberal’ papers should go down the drain.
13 posted on
10/15/2009 3:07:22 AM PDT by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is never "free")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson