[Hegewisch Dupa]

Does it bother you when people use "fit" as a euphemism for "scrawny"? That's far less attractive. A woman is more appealing 20 pounds to heavy than 10 pounds too light.

This has been proven in laboratories.

[Tublecane]

“Does it bother you when people use ‘fit’ as a euphemism for ‘scrawny’?”

I don’t know, I don’t hear that one as often. It does bother me that the standard for some women seems to be tightness and muscle tone. As if the feminine ideal were to be a 14 year old boy. I much prefer buxom.

“A woman is more appealing 20 pounds to heavy than 10 pounds too light.
This has been proven in laboratories.”

Makes sense. The extra fat makes them look more fertile.

[HamiltonJay]

There is a difference between buxom and flabby though.

This gal clearly has her mothers looks, unfortunatley though she carries a bit too much girth to be put in the “buxom” category.

I enjoy a woman with curves, but there is a limit to the excess where it becomes detrimental at least in terms of what I find attractive. This gal is definately far more than 20 lbs overweight. As long as you picture her from the chest up, no issues, or lying down, but if you see her standing full body, she has a bit too much around the middle for my taste.