Filing poorly-written briefs and getting judges mad at her will never get anything to discovery. It's painful to read her filings - I'm not a lawyer but know a few of 'em, have read a few briefs in my time as a result, and hers have to be the worst I have ever seen.
Is it more or less painful and or insane than reading the Cap and Tax Bill, or the Stimulus Bills, or any one of the manifold Health Care bills? Or any speech by Obama, or regulation issued out of his offices?
Just how should a Judge decide — on style points, or truth?
I’ve read many briefs. I’ve read many decisions. I’ve seen judges take up frivolous with alarming regularity. I’ve seen grotesque politics from the bench. I’ve noticed that most lawyers are as stupid as a box of rocks. I’ve seen the SCOTUS make irrational, unconstitutional decisions over and over. I’ve seen political correctness trump state constitutions. I’ve seen activist lawyers with NO BUSINESS being promoted to the SCOTUS and federal bench. I’ve read up on tainted trials, corrupt judges, judges masturbating under their cloaks. I’ve seen slimy liberal power lawyers lie through their teeth.
And I’ve seen a marxist quisling lawyer obfuscate his entire past so he could pretend to be President.