Skip to comments.Parents seek £1m for hammer attack on white son at 'race bullies' school
Posted on 10/21/2009 2:24:37 AM PDT by bogusname
A white pupil was battered with a hammer at a school where politically correct teachers were afraid to deal with racial tensions, the High Court heard yesterday...
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
SNIPPET: “The family’s lawyers told the court a ‘culture of racist bullying and harassment’ built up around a 30-strong gang called the ‘Asian Invasion’.”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1221759/Hammer-attack-victim-seeks-1m-damages-politically-correct-school-closed-eyes-racial-tensions-Henry-Webster-Asian-Invasion-Swindon-Ridgeway-Foundation.htm
Robert Glancey, QC, representing the family, said tensions escalated after the July 7 London bombings in 2005 and when more Asian pupils joined the school, some of whom were 'radicalised and hostile'.
As the white students go through school and are witness to these animals being treated with kid gloves while they are branded as 'racists' by default, they will likely grow up with a firm desire to vote for the most conservative political parties available, which is great, but will it be enough, and in time?
After the Black Hole of Calcutta came to be general knowledge, the British dealt with rebellious Sepoys by strapping them across the muzzles of field pieces and firing away. That was the first instance of the use of the phrase "to blow away" someone. Waging war was one thing, maltreatment of prisoners and civilians another.
This sort of thing would have produced a spate of hangings 150 years ago.
Obviously it’s the white student’s fault here. /s
What’s more funny is that they’re doing this at will. These aren’t people they shipped in as slaves 200 years ago. They’re allowing them in by the boatload for pretty much no good reason whatsoever. It’s as if they’re bored with existing.
Can’t we just ban hammers in Britain? Nobody really needs a hammer , screws hold so much better... Lets get a petition going .. we can do it! When hammers are outlawed only outlaws will have hammers.
Not so sure about that... we've had this sort of thing happen in the USA for at least a generation and look at the results.
Right. The Daily Mail is being rather politically correct itself.
All over the world the white race is being attacked and any words spoken of these attacks bring forth charges of white racism.
That’s because the whites are the least likely to do anything about it.
It is historical in Britain call someone of India, Pakistan Sri Lanka etc Asian other far east coutries we tend to call them oriental. It just states the difference between the races.
If the “oppressed class” doesn’t organize itself into a well armed militant group they are going to enjoy a slow, painful ride into cultural extinction.
It’s because the term Paki, and by extension Pakistani, has become a well earned expression of dislike of them by the general English population. Now Pakis can’t bear being called by their true name, and hide behind the coverall “Asian”.
We see the same phenom over and over again -
a group of people is referred to with a label which at first they approve.
But their culture is such that they become negatively known by the actions and behaviors of a certain subset of that group, be it a minority or a majority of the group is of no consequence - the fact is that they don’t address it and correct it.
The label that they preferred originally becomes a pejorative and they insist on being called something else.
Here, we have the Muslim immigrant invaders taking on the group name of those with a overall positive reputation, “Asians”.
I’m sure the true Asians are soon going to be asked to be referred to as something else, and “Asians” will become a pejorative.
I second the motion.
That’s what I’m thinking.
Nonsense. It’s bush’s fault... /s
No its nothing to do with that. It’s a legacy of Britain’s colonial history. “Asian” in Britain means “someone from the indian sub-continent”.
What in the USA are called asians are known as orientals in the UK.
Exactly as you say.
Ahh, I see. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I’ve always said that the U.S. and the U.K. are two countries separated by a common language.
Pakistani kids and pakistani’s have been doing this for years and getting away with it.
It is time it stopped but alas I think it will not but will probably get worse.
These pakistani parents don’t care unless whites go after their corner shops because they want to force as many white kids and folks as possible . That way these pakistani parents can buy up the houses and then give them out to their own pakistani family when they come over.
it’s stupid too.
I’m from there and we say Paki short for Pakistani, but the left now have declared that the term is racist.
course the idiots have no problem with any other abbreviation for anyone else in the world, i.e. Aussie, Afghan, Brit
no we always reffered to them as paki’s even when I was a kid.
It is now PC to call them Asian thus lumping an entire continent together even though they do not look the same.
That show how ignorant the left is and are.
Far as I am concerned and everyone I know in Salford then they still are Paki’s, we say Brits do we not, we say Afghans do we not ?
yes we do so I and other refer to them of what they are.
What is amazing how folks in England fall into line with the BBC/guardian PC crap.
They were NEVER referred to as “Pakis” on the national media. Ever. Pakistanis occsionally. Anyway, “Asian” is a better coverall term, as it includes Indian, Sikhs etc.
Asian is the usual term for Pakistani and Indian muslims in England. That area is in western Asia.
There is nothing unusual about the use of the word in England.
Ya, they’re Asian all right...
er they WAS AND ARE reffered to that many many times by everyone.
Not sure how old you are or where you come from but I am telling you that in my school and around our way in salford and Manc we all said paki in the 80’s and 70’s
even today I hear it a lot
to say it is racist is pathetic.
would Afghan be racist
, how aout Tajik, Kurd?
they all end in stan
Stan mean the land of and the I was added during the Brit empire as it was easier to include to say.
you want to fall for the PC BCC Guardian crap then by all means but it does not mean we all have to fall for it.
My wife says Paki all the time but where she comes form it mean package store, so when she says I’m off to the pakis it means for her to go to the corner shop and no there are no pakis there
NO Asian mean s the entire continent of ASIA which is wrong as it lumps all the continent into one regardless of what they look .
For example the police say they are looking for an Asian.
OK is he chinese, Thai,Indian.
you have no idea what so ever if you heard that out of the PC UK and neither would anyone else.
The UK had no problem calling them pakis short of pakistani’s but some white left wing kooks said it was not nice and the immigrants heard this and jumped on it.
In a few years the term for them will be something other than Asian .
Anyway like I said in another thread those who group an entire country together are the ones showing their ignorance.
When the police or victim describes the attacker they should be describing the person not going by PC crap.
sadly many in the UK fall for this PC and some cannot see it in any way shape of form because of their ignorance
I think I said on the national media, not out on the streets.
never saw you mention the media on your post to me
Post #30....the one that you replied to.
See the growth of such groups as the “Aryan Brotherhood”, “Nazi Low riders”.
Britain would be far far better off if their Asian population consisted of what we would call Asians.