While I have no problem at all with anyone else having or using OnStar; my issue is that this technology has in the past been used against the owner. The police have, in the past, activated the OnStar device and recorded the driver's (and passenger's)conversations. In the case listed, the police not only monitored and recorded a drug transaction, they followed the car to the location of the transaction and apprehended everyone involved; using the tapes as evidence.
So, if the drug dealer's own car and equipment can be used to monitor his converstations for months, and his every movement monitored - what about the person who is facing a divorce? Child Custody? Late payments on bills? Job investigation? Where is the line drawn? Or, I can chose to not own OnStar and avoid any possible invasion of my privacy. Want to bug me, then buy your own darn bug - don't hack my property to use my technology against me.