Replies

Uh, they are on oath as saying that most probably the "ID" is dead since there has been no evidence of his interaction in the universe in the last few hundred million years.

Uh, you continue to miss my point. ID is not looking for "proofs" of God. Rather it is looking at the natural world, and has noticed that it seems to be lawful in its conduct, ordered. That is, it shows all the hallmarks of intelligence in the coordinated disposition of its parts, which together constitute the whole of which they are parts, and at the same time cannot be understood as parts absent the idea of an intelligible whole.

71 posted on 10/24/2009 2:19:07 PM PDT by betty boop (Without God man neither knows which way to go, nor even understands who he is. Â—Pope Benedict XVI)

Uh, you continue to miss my point. ID is not looking for "proofs" of God.

They are looking for proofs of the Intelligent Designer. What is the difference between the ID and God?

72 posted on 10/24/2009 2:22:30 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")

Uh, you continue to miss my point. ID Evolution is not looking for "proofs" of God. Rather it is looking at the natural world, and has noticed that it seems to be lawful in its conduct, ordered. That is, it shows all the hallmarks of intelligence in the coordinated disposition of its parts, which together constitute the whole of which they are parts, and at the same time cannot be understood as parts absent the idea of an intelligible whole.

73 posted on 10/24/2009 2:31:41 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")