==Name something you have seen in your experience that I made up
You just said that “YEC’ers consider anyone that does not accept their YEC philosophy to be non-Christians?” You made that one up out of thin air. As such, you have once again been caught fabricating. Normally I try to ignore your disruptive behavior. The only reason I am wasting one minute of my time on you is to expose yet another one of your many lies.
I didn't make it up and even linked to the YECHEADQUARTERS which supported my position.
You can call it a lie but you offered nothing to prove it a lie.
What is it that you are claiming I didn't get from you?
Here is something from one of your YEC sites you frequently post from showing the desire of the YEC’ers to eliminate the OEC’s!
“In fact, if the young-earth creationists increase in numbers, then they will soon make up more than half of the average college science class. At some point, the frequency of young-earthers will be large enough to threaten the control that the old-earth creationist professor is trying to maintain in the classroom. This could generate something of a crisis in the classroom. On the other hand, if young-earth students and their parents asked the right questions and demanded young-age creation teaching from Christian colleges, what looks like a crisis could be transformed into a revolution in the teaching of Christian college science.”
You can buy this DVD at your YEC site.
“The church’s compromise on biblical authority began before Charles Darwin. This eye-opening talk by historian Terry Mortenson shows that biblical geologists defended biblical history (and exposed the fallacies in an old earth), but the church refused to listen.”
Apparently, 12,000 year old earth is the limit for fellowship.
Editor’s note: AiG stands firmly on the authority of Scripture. From our study of the Bible, we are persuaded that Creation occurred in six normal-length days about 6000 years ago, and that God destroyed the earth with a global Flood about 1600 years later. Many Christians who profess to believe that the Bible is God’s Word do not accept the straightforward interpretation of Genesis and accept millions of years (and sometimes evolution also). They often admit that their interpretation of Scripture is controlled by the findings of “science,” which, in reality, are the naturalistic, uniformitarian interpretations of scientific data.
Some young-earth creationists are persuaded by Bible-based arguments that there are gaps in the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11. They therefore believe the creation is up to 10,000–12,000 years old. While AiG does not agree with this view, we do not break fellowship with such creationists but stand shoulder to shoulder with them in opposing the evolutionary idea of millions of years.
Apparently I am not the only one.
http://domesticadventure.blogspot.com/2009/01/evolution-creation-wheres-truth.html
I really like Ross’ books, but I wanted to give Young-Earth Creationism an equal shot. I read one of Henry Morris’s books and wasn’t terribly impressed or convinced. I then took a look at Answers In Genesis and was rather appalled. Ken Ham essentially said that a person who does not believe in Young-Earth Creationism can’t be a Christian since they don’t believe the Bible. Not only was I distressed by comments like this, but I found the attitude of most of the AiG material to have an unacceptably negative attitude toward scientists. I took classes, including labs, taught by the same PhDs who were being portrayed as either duped or deceptive by the AiG writers and speakers.
That from the guy that dedicates special threads in my honor? Bro?