If he was born in Hawaii, like he says, why would showing his BC be damaging or incriminating?
I don’t really expect him to anyway, but I do expect the nation to demand it and the courts to force him to show it. The constitution requires a president to be a natural born citizen and Obama is hiding the best evidence for it.
If he was born in Hawaii, like he says, why would showing his BC be damaging or incriminating?
I don’t really expect him to anyway, but I do expect the nation to demand it and the courts to force him to show it. The constitution requires a president to be a natural born citizen and Obama is hiding the best evidence for it.
The Director of the State of Hawaii’s Health Department has verified the information contained on that Certificate of Live Birth and she has declared Obama to be a “natural born citizen.”
The Constitution requires birth in the US and not to a foreign diplomat parent and being 35 years of age, ONLY. The Constitution does not ask what hospital you were born in or who was your father.
The Attorney General of Hawaii (a Republican named Mark Bennett) has the power under Hawaii statutes to seek a subpoena for Obama’s original birth records but in the year and a half that this controversy has been in the public, Bennett has not chosen to seek such a subpoena.
No one who opposes Obama would trust a document released by him anyway. Its best that the courts do it, if that is their legal will.
Thus far all attempts to secure release of Obama’s birth records through the courts and through the Supreme Court have failed. The Supreme Court has had five opportunities to entertain cases on Obama’s eligibility and it only takes four Justices to agree to hear a case before the full court (the “rule of four). That means that the conservative justices: Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts have not agreed to take on a case.