After reading through the article, I skimmed around the site, WND, which I hadn’t visited in years. I can think of no other site that gives such a negative image for true conservatives than WND. A true contender for Coast-to-Coast AM guests of the year.
Maybe they should emulate TownHall or American Spectator to see how a real conservative site is run.
They carry a lot of different stuff. Carrying Thomas Sowell makes up for many many lesser things. To say he nailed an issue is typically redundant.
Soothesayer9
Since Jul 26, 2009
WND can be a bit crazy but what they are saying in this article is true.
14 percent of their traffic comes from Drudge.
They have some of the best colominists in the industry.
Michael Ackley
Herman Cain
Vox Day Roger Hedgecock
Chuck Norris
Ellen Ratner Barbara Simpson
Craig R. Smith
Pat Buchanan
Janet Porter
Les Kinsolving David Limbaugh
Mychal Massie
Dennis Prager Dave Ramsey
Thomas Sowell
Dave Welch
Ann Coulter
Barry Farber
Nat Hentoff Molotov Mitchell
Phyllis Schlafly
Benjamin Shapiro Jill Stanek
John Stossel
Walter Williams
Thursday
Jack Cashill
Jane Chastain
Phil Elmore Larry Elder
Jackie Mason
Craige McMillan Erik Rush
Friday
Pat Buchanan
Alan Keyes
David Limbaugh Ilana Mercer
Burt Prelutsky
Bill Press Robert Ringer
Letter of the week
Pat Boone
Jonathan Falwell
Henry Lamb Greg Laurie
Patrice Lewis
Star Parker Tom Tancredo
Ellis Washington
Ted Baehr
Samuel Blumenfeld
Ray Comfort
Jerome Corsi
Aliza Davidovit
Mike Evans Elizabeth Farah
Rebecca Hagelin
Bob Just
Andrea Shea King
David Kupelian
Hal Lindsey Judge Roy Moore
Jesse Lee Peterson
Judith Reisman
Jim Rutz
Michael Savage
Roger Simmermaker
If you can get over their tabloidish look and tacky ads
which is how they pay their bills, many of their columnist are
first rate.
They very often are the first to break impoartant news
and Stossel, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Mychal Massie,etc
write some excellent articles.
So just what's so negative about that?