They have been absolutely incorrect about PE being somehow an explanation or consequence of the likelihood of mutation of particular sequences, and many other things.
Cite as in citation, not site.
You do not understand that no theory is ever ‘proven’.
Anyone who thinks my posts support the Incompetent Design idiocy put forth by the Discovery Insistute would have to be delusional.
You lack the credibility to make any such assessment; as your lack of understanding of the basics of science, evolution, and punctuated equilibrium is obvious for all to see.
Nope, your reference to airplanes and then to dogs is totally consistent with ID. You have never explained how such reference does not support ID. Your post leads me to believe that you support PE in spite of the fact that most of the scientific community has moved along. If I were a believer in the theory of evolution I would ask you to stop posting because your lack of understand does not help us. If I were a believer in ID or Creation I would encourage you to keep posting because it is apparent to many on this board that you are confused.