I don't know why the squid ink is so shocking. Elizibeth Philpot wrote of taking sepia from a fossil cuttlefish collected by Mary Anning and doing illustrations - about 1820! I guess someone needs to do a tad more research.
And the quote "It is difficult to imagine how you can have something as soft and sloppy as an ink sac…inside a rock that is 150 million years old" is completely disingenuous. The original reads, "It is difficult to imagine how you can have something as soft and sloppy as an ink sac fossilised in three dimensions, still black, and inside a rock that is 150 million years old."
Just another example of lying for god.
We have already been all over this, stormer. All they did was add liquid to the contents of the ink sack and they were literally able to draw the squid using its own ink. Thus, the contents of the ink sack were not fossilized. Nice try...but as usual, epic fail.
