No, Dawkins is an idiot. He is so bad, even some atheists think he is a 'troll' out to discredit their arguments. I see him like Michel Moore of politics, he acts outrageous and makes strong, unsubstantiated or illogical arguments and personal attacks just for the shock value. Usually when you resort to the Michael Moore type debate, as Dawkins does, it shows you either have no logical or rational argument, or your motivation is shock, not selling your side.
Someone who claims to have an argument but just jumps to subjective labels like 'the greatest force of evil' is compensating for their lack of rational evidence.
My post does not mean I endorse everything Dawkins says. I just posted it for information. It is good that he took on Islam because it has liberals in a bind when that happens. You can throw this at liberals who defend Islam and watch the fun as they get confused because one of their idols has bashed Islam.
I don’t think that Islamofascists deserve politeness and that the demand to explain the punishment for apostasy in Islam was a good one. Also, I wouldn’t put Michael Moore in the same league as Dawkins. Dawkins has at least criticized Islam, I doubt if Moore would do that.