Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mate debate: Is monogamy realistic? (CNN Continues it's Downward Spiral)
CNN.com ^ | 10/28/09 | A. Pawlowski,

Posted on 10/28/2009 10:15:17 AM PDT by Reaganesque

(CNN) -- If you were to judge the success rate of monogamy by the sex lives of public figures, perhaps couples should change their marriage vows to say, "Till a tempting new partner do us part."

Talk-show host David Letterman recently joined former presidential candidate John Edwards, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford and former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer on a long list of politicians and entertainers (think Jude Law) who have admitted having sex outside their marriage or committed relationship.

But do they just illustrate the realities of modern life?

In the age of hookups, friends with benefits and online dating, and as human life expectancy grows, is it still reasonable to expect people to pair up and stay monogamous until death do them part?

"It's realistic that some people can mate for life in the same sense that some people can play the Beethoven violin concerto or other people can ice-skate beautifully or learn a new language," said psychiatrist Judith Eve Lipton.

Added evolutionary biologist David Barash, "It's within the realm of human potential, but it's not easy."

Lipton and Barash, who have been married 32 years and are the co-authors of "Strange Bedfellows" and "The Myth of Monogamy," said serial monogamy may be more realistic -- a model in which people move from one committed long-term relationship to another and choose partners for different reasons at different stages of their life.

Possibilities in polyamory?

For some, even serial monogamy seems too restrictive.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cnn; homosexualagenda; monogamy; moralabsolutes; morality; realistic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
This is Liberalism in a nutshell. These people are 100% focused on themselves and their pleasures. Zero consideration is given to the consequences of their actions, either to themselves, to those around them or to society in general. They want what they want and they want it right now and if they don't get it then their "rights" have been violated. It is the politics of the "Spoiled Brat."

We are dealing with people who have the emotional maturity of your average 12-13 year old. As any parent knows who has raised a 12-13 year old, they know that the child believes they know everything there is to know and if you correct them in any way, shape or form, they whine about how unfair and tyrannical you are. Even the best, most informed, heart-felt and lovingly delivered advice you can give them is rejected out of hand because you are hopelessly un-hip in their eyes. And now, these retarded adolescents run our government and, increasingly, our lives. Heaven help us!

1 posted on 10/28/2009 10:15:19 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

“Mate debate: Is monogamy realistic?”

My fiancee says yes.


2 posted on 10/28/2009 10:17:05 AM PDT by Grunthor (Thank YOU George Bush, for giving us the GOP of today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

once they all started spinning for Bubba & Lewinsky you cluld see where this was headed


3 posted on 10/28/2009 10:17:18 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Seems to me, ancient societies adopted this outlook, just prior to their collapses.


4 posted on 10/28/2009 10:18:03 AM PDT by DakotaRed (What happened to the country I fought for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Trust a Liberal to classify human relations as something mechanical.
5 posted on 10/28/2009 10:19:52 AM PDT by oyez ( damnant quod non intelligunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Then you better say yes too!


6 posted on 10/28/2009 10:19:57 AM PDT by colorado tanker (Mr. Flyingsaucerballoonboymediawhoreman - this Bud's for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Q. What is the same between former ESPN baseball analyst Steve Phillips and former US President Bill Clinton?

A. Both had extramarital flings with homely interns

Q. What is the difference between former ESPN baseball analyst Steve Phillips and former US President Bill Clinton?

A. Phillips suffered consequences


7 posted on 10/28/2009 10:20:21 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

I think it basically boils down to the commitment level of the individual. If you can’t keep a commitment of any kind, you have no business getting married. People have to work at it if it’s important to them. Nobody ever said it’s easy. All depends on whether a person wants it or not.


8 posted on 10/28/2009 10:20:49 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

“It’s realistic that some people can mate for life in the same sense that some people can play the Beethoven violin concerto or other people can ice-skate beautifully or learn a new language,” said psychiatrist Judith Eve Lipton.”

If someone is a person that is so selfish that they cannot possibly remain monogamous in a comitted relationship, that person ought to remain single for the remainder of his/her days rather than ruin the lives of successive partners.


9 posted on 10/28/2009 10:20:54 AM PDT by Grunthor (Thank YOU George Bush, for giving us the GOP of today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

“Then you better say yes too!”

So I’ve learned, lol!


10 posted on 10/28/2009 10:21:33 AM PDT by Grunthor (Thank YOU George Bush, for giving us the GOP of today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
It is the politics of the "Spoiled Brat."

Can't be repeated often enough.

11 posted on 10/28/2009 10:22:22 AM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Some people are rather selfish and could never live outside of their own bubble.


12 posted on 10/28/2009 10:22:22 AM PDT by Rick_Michael (Have no fear "President Government" is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

See post 9.....you beat me by seconds.


13 posted on 10/28/2009 10:22:40 AM PDT by Grunthor (Thank YOU George Bush, for giving us the GOP of today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

My wife thinks highly of it too! :-)


14 posted on 10/28/2009 10:22:51 AM PDT by Reaganesque ("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
"Added evolutionary biologist David Barash, 'It's within the realm of human potential, but it's not easy'"

No one ever said it is "easy". It takes alot of work and committment, two attributes that are sadly lacking in today's hedonistic society.

15 posted on 10/28/2009 10:24:09 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

In reading this, I got an inkling that perhaps CNN knows something about a high level, perhaps even Presidential, affair... and they are laying the groundwork for it’s revelation.


16 posted on 10/28/2009 10:24:42 AM PDT by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
"My fiancee says yes."

LOL, always a good sign.

17 posted on 10/28/2009 10:25:53 AM PDT by VR-21 (There was a rush, along the Fulham Road....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Sorry.....I didn’t mean to steal your thunder. Great minds think alike. Or something like that.


18 posted on 10/28/2009 10:26:20 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
I've always made it very clear to Mr. Peel that he is free to stray with any lady he wishes - BUT he must follow the ground rules - they are: He needs to collect $20 million from the other woman prior to the indiscretion; he needs to collect this money in advance, AND - when he indulges himself, he absolutely cannot enjoy himself at all. To the last point, Mr. Peel has often asked: "Can I at least enjoy collecting the money?"

So far, after 20 years of marriage, Mr. Peel has not raised $20 million.

19 posted on 10/28/2009 10:27:34 AM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel (a government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Is monogamy realistic?

It's worked for me for the past 25 years and, God willing, will continue to work for at least the next 25 as well.

20 posted on 10/28/2009 10:28:19 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson